Country: England
Alright this one is more fair. If we beat Chelsea I suppose we can't complain.
I'll eat my hat if we beat Chelsea though.
Alright this one is more fair. If we beat Chelsea I suppose we can't complain.
So it looks like our main contenders in my eyes City are out of the race for the title.
We've underachieved imo if one of Sp**s, Liverpool and Chelsea win the league over us, we are better than all three and should be ahead of them in the table.
but but the stats say that its because of the cost of our squad, that we can never win the league because the other teams have more money than us.
We've got a better squad than either Chelsea or Liverpool. Beat Chelsea and we'll be just 5 points behind them.The thing is that Wenger isn't better than Klopp and Conte.
Of course I don't like it if people are posting stuff to make us look bad. That's part of being a supporter ffs.There was a top 6 league posted below, which is better. A top 6 table is perfectly fair considering they are all within touching distance, before the big drop off to Everton.
It's an objective statistic. No bias, it's perfectly rational to include the top 6. You don't like it because it reflects poorly on us.
We've got a better squad than either Chelsea or Liverpool. Beat Chelsea and we'll be just 5 points behind them.
Of course I don't like it if people are posting stuff to make us look bad. That's part of being a supporter ffs.
We're 4th in a very tight league of 20, and people are posting a mini league of only 6 games where we've played fewer than the others,just so we can be bottom.
We've underachieved imo if one of Sp**s, Liverpool and Chelsea win the league over us, we are better than all three and should be ahead of them in the table.
Of course I don't like it if people are posting stuff to make us look bad. That's part of being a supporter ffs.
We're 4th in a very tight league of2092, and people are posting a mini league of only 6 games where we've played fewer than the others,just so we can be bottom.
True, so let's wait to the end of the season when there's enough games for it to be meaningful, and even more important, everybody's played the same amount if games.Isn't that the easiest way to see where we at against top teams ? We have to compare with them,not with Stoke and Sunderland in terms of head to head results.Sometimes results against our main rivals in later stages of the season can be cruical.And overall we were quite **** against them in many years now.
Even better, thanksFixed for you. Remember we're 4th out of 92.
i was being sarcasticIt boggles the mind how people believe this nonsense when, as pointed out earlier, Koeman continues to outwit Wenger with Everton now as he previously did with Southampton. Both have squads that have been put together at a fraction of what we spent to build our team.
I'm afraid that won't be happening unless Cazorla comes back 6 foot 2 and on PED's.Bit simplistic that. Chelsea are heading for a 90+ point season.
I want to see ~85 points this year from Arsenal. If another team tops that then fair play.
i was being sarcastic
It can't all be sunshine and rainbows! People are allowed to bring up problems, our record against big sides (bar last season) has been poor. If anything this season's table is an improvement!Of course I don't like it if people are posting stuff to make us look bad. That's part of being a supporter ffs.
We're 4th in a very tight league of 20, and people are posting a mini league of only 6 games where we've played fewer than the others,just so we can be bottom.
The thing is that Wenger isn't better than Klopp and Conte.
Bit simplistic that. Chelsea are heading for a 90+ point season.
I want to see ~85 points this year from Arsenal. If another team tops that then fair play.
I think all the top managers in the division are at a similar level; all of them have their strengths and weaknesses. Absolutely Conte and Klopp are better than Arsène in some aspects of management however Wenger has strengths that are superior to the aforementioned coaches.