• ! ! ! IMPORTANT MESSAGE ! ! !

    Discussions about police investigations

    In light of recent developments about a player from Premier League being arrested and until there is an official announcement, ALL users should refrain from discussing or speculating about situations around personal off-pitch matters related to any Arsenal player. This is to protect you and the forum.

    Users who disregard this reminder will be issued warnings and their posts will get deleted from public.

Chelsea FC: Carabottlejobs

Taylor Gang Gunners

Taylor Gang Gunners

Say Yeh or You're Making The List
Trusted ⭐
SYS said:
Still counted as a title. Now no one cares how Chelsea won titles a decade back.
Click to expand...

Course it counts, but it's tainted and of course people still care :lol:.

How often do you hear people refer to Chelski as an oil club? Russian play toy? Billionaire boys etc. Chelski are constantly ridiculed about their success, it's all attributed to Abramovic.

If we win the league, of course we as Arsenal fans would take it, but it'll be jarring as f*ck to hear "you only won because of the points deduction."
 
SYS

SYS

Active Member
Taylor Gang Gunners said:
Course it counts, but it's tainted and of course people still care :lol:.

How often do you hear people refer to Chelski as an oil club? Russian play toy? Billionaire boys etc. Chelski are constantly ridiculed about their success, it's all attributed to Abramovic.

If we win the league, of course we as Arsenal fans would take it, but it'll be jarring as f*ck to hear "you only won because of the points deduction."
Click to expand...

We did no wrong here. On people still calling Chelski stuff the media doesnt do, its the opposition fans. We get called stingy like wise, the taunts keep evolving but never stop
 
Last edited:
Rimaal

Rimaal

Mesmerised By Raccoons
Trusted ⭐
Taylor Gang Gunners said:
I don't want them to be deducted points. If we win the league it'll be all "Chelsea would've walked it if they never had that points deduction."

We're gonna have to win it outright.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I don't give a flying fūck. I'll take it an happily, and people can waste their breath saying whatever the fūck they want until their faces turn blue & their eyes pop vessels.
 
David_Smith

David_Smith

Active Member
SYS said:
We did no wrong here. On people still calling Chelski stuff the media doesnt do, its the opposition fans. We get called stingy like wise, the taunts keep evolving but never stop
Click to expand...

First of all they do. They keep going on about how Abramovic transformed the club.
Second it doesn't matter. It won't be forgotten.
 
celestis

celestis

Arsenal-Mania Veteran
Moderator

Country: Australia
Taylor Gang Gunners said:
I don't want them to be deducted points. If we win the league it'll be all "Chelsea would've walked it if they never had that points deduction."

We're gonna have to win it outright.
Click to expand...

Yeah true mate , but in this case regardless of how it looks for rivals they need points deducted . It's sexual abuse , football Association cannot be perceived to be above the law .
 
Juan Matas Beard

Juan Matas Beard

Pronouns: dat, guy 🫶
Trusted ⭐

Country: England
Can't stop winning. Sunderland played with 7 defenders and still managed to end up being 3 on 1.

Great goal from Fabregas.

 
J

James Bond

Moderation Consultant
Chelsea’s Stamford Bridge stadium development plan set for approval

Chelsea’s potential redevelopment of Stamford Bridge could move a sizeable step closer on Wednesday as the planning application for a 60,000-seater stadium is presented to Hammersmith and Fulham Council.

The Premier League leaders have decided developing their current home, rather than relocating elsewhere, is their preferred option as they look to provide a stadium with a capacity similar in size to other top-flight clubs.

The planning and development control committee of Hammersmith and Fulham Council has a meeting scheduled for 7pm on Wednesday, although the council has already recommended the application be approved.

The proximity of underground and overground railway lines are one of the biggest challenges for a project of its scale in an area of west London that offers little wiggle room.

The Chelsea owner, Roman Abramovich, would fund the project, which has an estimated cost of £500m. That figure could rise if the club remain at Stamford Bridge while the work takes place, although it would mean Chelsea would not need to find a temporary home for around three seasons.

Twickenham has been mooted as a contender for a part-time base for the 2012 Champions League winners, although Wembley could also be a candidate.

That would again muddy the waters as Tottenham Hotspur will occupy the national stadium for at least the 2017-18 season as work finishes on their own new stadium in north London.

Stamford Bridge’s capacity is 41,663, making it the seventh biggest in the Premier League. It falls well short of Manchester United’s 76,000-seater Old Trafford, while Arsenal, Manchester City, West Ham United, Sunderland and Liverpool boast bigger grounds.

Chelsea had previously looked at sites including Battersea Power Station for a new ground, but concluded their ideal arena could be created at their present location. The club believe the history of Stamford Bridge is with the site, rather than the stadium itself.

The build would be complex and involve excavation, with the plan to lower the arena into the ground to achieve the capacity on a 12-acre site.
Click to expand...

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/jan/10/chelsea-stamford-bridge-stadium-plan

Chelsea is going to get the go ahead on their stadium remodel and Roman is going to fund it completely.
 
GDeep™

GDeep™

League is very weak
Decent fee plus the 60M they got for Oscar means there is over 100M potentially available for an Aubamayeng maybe.
 
GDeep™

GDeep™

League is very weak
I know Conte really likes two players in London, one wears white and scores,the other wears red and scores.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Top Bottom