Arsenal and Liverpool transfer deal makes perfect sense

Football rumours are a funny thing aren’t they? It is safe to say that there truly isn’t anything off limits regarding possible transfer deals. From the probable to the downright outrageous, if it can be dreamt, it can be published. Arsenal has been involved in some plenty outlandish rumours over the years as well, with links to player and bids that reach beyond realism.

This latest rumour involving a possible swap between Theo Walcott and Raheem Sterling however doesn’t fall into this category contrary to popular belief. It actually makes a lot of sense despite its apparent unlikeliness.

Both are contract rebels at the moment, and don’t seem likely to sign, which in the long run will only force their respective manager’s hands. A swap makes perfect sense not only for football reasons, but for financial reasons as well. The two are like for like from a playing standpoint, with blistering pace and a bag full of tricks down the flank.

Financially, the players’ wages are believed to be compatible, with Walcott’s £100k-per-week believed to be close in number to the improved terms Sterling is being offered. I know what you are thinking; if he has refused to sign it at Liverpool, why would he sign it at Arsenal?

It is believed that Sterling has had his head turned by Liverpool’s failings in the Champions League, both in the competition itself and with earning consistent entry into it, and Arsenal could be the solution he is looking for. Liverpool are reportedly keen on Walcott to replace Sterling should he go, and what better way to do that then to swap the two directly?

To be fair, Arsenal would perhaps be getting the better end of the stick, with Sterling younger and far less injury prone than Walcott, but in Walcott Liverpool would be getting a proven and seasoned Premier League goal scorer. It would truly be a fantastic bit of business for all involved.

While both clubs would perhaps be reluctant to have to play against their former stars at least twice a year, it surely beats losing them for free. As for the players themselves, Sterling in particular, they may prefer to stay in England than go abroad (and sit on Madrid’s bench).

Still a very unlikely deal, but it does make a lot of sense. What do you think Gooners? Is Walcott for Sterling a sensible swap for Arsenal?