So by their logic, Carragher should of stopped their car, got out, then punched the girl or her father and that would seem less offensive and violent and would make him less of a bad person? Unbelievable.
. ****ing hell.
Maybe he has Hepatitis.So by their logic, Carragher should of stopped their car, got out, then punched the girl or her father and that would seem less offensive and violent and would make him less of a bad person? Unbelievable.
Yes spitting is disgusting, but to be punched by someone angry enough could cause determinant damage, hit hard enough and in the right place could kill someone. But nah, I'd rather be punched than spat on
What's the charge when if you accidentally drown someone? Still manslaughter I suppose... Well he nearly got done for that.
I wasn't referring to the Carragher incident there. I was addressing Rimaal's foolish effort.
Look at this nonsense argument you're trying to run with... I said I, as in ME, a guy, would rather take a punch from my partner than be spat at by her. I dont expect a women to prefer a punch in the face, but then who knows? As much as you'd probably like to believe that you do, you don't speak for every women on earth.
So by their logic, Carragher should of stopped their car, got out, then punched the girl or her father and that would seem less offensive and violent and would make him less of a bad person? Unbelievable.
Yes spitting is disgusting, but to be punched by someone angry enough could cause determinant damage, hit hard enough and in the right place could kill someone. But nah, I'd rather be punched than spat on
No, that's not the 'logic'. That's quite a severe exaggeration ffs. See my reply to AG. Jesus wept.
Let's not argue semantics here, he or they it's not a huge difference is it? I'm not blaming her or calling her the instigator.
The initial report I read stated that they "spotted him" a few miles from Old Trafford. Unless they just happened to be driving side by side with him at the same exact speed and then by some chance turn to see him in the next lane, it stands to reason that they made the effort to get in such close proximity.
I'm comparing the intent of the interaction. This isn't like randomly seeing a celebrity and asking for a picture. This guy saw an opportunity and got his phone out. It's entrapment in all honesty.
You're creating this 'intent' though. This all all based on your strange premise that they went all out for a reaction, and it's rubbish! Not everyone who films a footballer after a resukt is seeking a reaction. Like that even matters anyway. This is so disturbingly strange. Entrapment
What else is the purpose of the dad filming his interaction with Carragher then? He wanted to get his reaction (good or bad) on camera, it's WorldStarHipHop/TMZ syndrome.
Why do you come onto this forum? I don't spit or hit my wife so I won't bother asking her. As usual you've completely derailed the subject so you can stand on your high horse over a hypothetical situation
YOU brought up your wife, not I. YOU said you would tolerate your wife hitting you but would divorce her if she spat on you. I was simply wondering if she would have the same response.
Listen to the guy's reaction after Carragher spat at him, of course it's relevant. He got the reaction he was looking to provoke. Nobody is absolving Carragher of blame. He should never have engaged with the guy and just kept driving.
", it's obviously meant as harmless banter. Would it upset some? Sure. But the extent of it would be someone telling me to "**** off" (likely @THunter ) while most others would take it on the chin and write something along the lines of "You played well/well deserved!". That's what usually happens, and we all move on. That's basically what this guy did. The reaction he got was so over the top that there was no reasonable way he could've expected that to happen, and it was so out of line that he wanted to pass it on.
