Leeroy1979
Active Member
Too late in the day to be rescued? Wonder what we offered as a loan fee and what was wanred
I'm actually excited for next season. A couple more signings, as well as players like Nelson and Smith-Rowe hopefully ready for the first team, I think we could mean business.
Next season we'll only need to strength our defense and width we have good enough player in other position plus hopefully ESR Nelson will part of the team next seasonI'm actually excited for next season. A couple more signings, as well as players like Nelson and Smith-Rowe hopefully ready for the first team, I think we could mean business.
So I still don't quite understand. What financial restrictions do we have ?
Those two will be big for us next season i want them to play.Any chance that the loans were to give Smith-Rowe and Nelson time to develop without being tied to a particular player?
We need one starting cb & winger, back up right back and GK. Possibly a cm but I'm quite happy with our options there, just wish Xhaka was quickerNext season we'll only need to strength our defense and width we have good enough player in other position plus hopefully ESR Nelson will part of the team next season
It's well-known this is what he's been doing.So I still don't quite understand. What financial restrictions do we have ?
Is it STCC(problem with wages growth per season >7mln) ? I read about it few articles, but we don't have a problem to pay salaries to a new players albeit they're loaned(I didn't see anywhere written, that there is difference in adding wages to total wages amount from loaned player comparing to straight bought player). Is it problem with plain cash ? If so, then to what are all the money from cash balance are designated for ?
SwissRamble, while writing about the lastest Arsenal's financial report:
After 2 years when #AFC cash balance fell, it has rebounded £51m to an all-time high of £231m. Clearly, this cannot all be used to buy new players, e.g. have to maintain £36m debt service reserve, but the figure is likely to raise a few eyebrows when the club is pleading poverty.
I always recently believed, that something shady is going on. Maybe Kroenke is using Arsenal as leverage(or something like that?) for all his loans(building Rams stadium and all the complex around it). The more money we'll have in the cash balance, the higher Arsenal's value will be.
Isn't it proven the only money Kronke has ever taken out if Arsenal was £3 million? The reason we have no money to spend is because of the disgusting business we've done in the last decade. Kronke just doesn't put money in.
We wont know anymore now that they don't have to make accounts public. It'll all be guess work by the AST.Isn't it proven the only money Kronke has ever taken out if Arsenal was £3 million? The reason we have no money to spend is because of the disgusting business we've done in the last decade. Kronke just doesn't put money in.
We wont know anymore now that they don't have to make accounts public. It'll all be guess work by the AST.
Weren't those just the AST's though? Since Arsenal isn't a publicly traded company anymore, I don't think the Club themselves will be releasing them. Kroenke clearly disliked that component when being majority owner.They released the financial results albeit late
I mean... Yeah, we've made bad financial decisions when it comes to players.Isn't it proven the only money Kronke has ever taken out if Arsenal was £3 million? The reason we have no money to spend is because of the disgusting business we've done in the last decade. Kronke just doesn't put money in.
It's well-known this is what he's been doing.
Stan Kroenke: I didn't buy Arsenal stake to win trophies
https://www.standard.co.uk/sport/fo...y-arsenal-stake-to-win-trophies-a3202046.html