Country: England
All the signs say he’s worth at least extending.People making a fuss over nothing. They just want to hang on to him for the sake of it.
If the club let him go they better be sure.
All the signs say he’s worth at least extending.People making a fuss over nothing. They just want to hang on to him for the sake of it.
I'd rather the whole club sank.Wouldnt you rather give him chance to sink or swim before parting ways? He's been impressive out on loan so why not.
He plays a position of need and showed some promise. Why wouldn't we try to keep him or at least extend him to drive his price up? He's another prospect mismanaged by this club.
Find it hard to believe that we'd not offer him a new deal to protect his value same as we did for El Neny and Chambers. He's agent must be planting those stories in the polish media because he wants to leave.
The coaches probably don't rate him defensively. Even at the Euros he was a bit defensively suspect but very good on the ball. His manager at Charlton said something similar.
He does deserve a season to show his worth probably as a Xhaka alternative. Skillset is similar to Xhakas.
He's had two good loan spells at Birmingham then Charlton. Was also very unlucky with injuries in between which stunted his progress. Personally think that if a young player impresses on loan he should get a look in for the first team.Can I ask why he deserves it? He clearly wants to leave and there is nothing to indicate Bielik will help us close the gap on Sp**s, never mind City or Liverpool.
He's had two good loan spells at Birmingham then Charlton. Was also very unlucky with injuries in between which stunted his progress. Personally think that if a young player impresses on loan he should get a look in for the first team.
He'll probably not be good enough to be a starter but can be a good back up/utility like Delph was at City. The fact that he's homegrown is another plus. Would probably do El Neny's role for half he's wages.
Man City have sold Diaz and Sancho, why?
We need a top cb and a top cm. If selling Bielik aids in getting either of these done, then why would you not be for it? couldn't care less if he becomes a good player in 5 years time.
Man City can afford to offload those players and bring in anyone they want. We are a coupon clipping club and need all the help we can get. Comparing us with City just doesn't compute because they operate multiple levels above us. We can't afford to sign top CBs or CMs because of the risk involved if they flop - we have to sign younger ones (cheaper) and hope they develop into those types of players.
If we are the club that sticks with the self sustaining model and all of that then we should be keeping our young players or at the very least extending them to get some more transfer funding from their sales. I don't care if we sell Bielik - I care that we aren't maximizing his transfer value if/when we do sell these guys.
10m for Bielik would be great business. Signing him to a new contract could see us in a Jenkinson or Campbell position where we lose money on him.
He does if we slap him in the face with 50k.He doesn’t want to apparently.
Not bad if we got 10m we need to sell him quick so it'll help us to get us CBhttps://sportowefakty.wp.pl/pilka-n...ze-krystiana-bielika-w-gre-wchodzi-spora-suma
Articles says we want 10m Bielik. Interest from clubs of the Championsship - Derby, West Brom, Middlesborough, Brentford.
Top championship side can't pay 8m pound? Are they that poor?No championship side is paying that.
Thought it was £10m.Top championship side can't pay 8m pound? Are they that poor?
I think in Article say 10M euros not much difference i think we'll sell him aboardThought it was £10m.
That’s probably the limit though tbh.