• ! ! ! IMPORTANT MESSAGE ! ! !

    Discussions about police investigations

    In light of recent developments about a player from Premier League being arrested and until there is an official announcement, ALL users should refrain from discussing or speculating about situations around personal off-pitch matters related to any Arsenal player. This is to protect you and the forum.

    Users who disregard this reminder will be issued warnings and their posts will get deleted from public.

PL: Arsenal v Manchester City | December 15, 16:30 GMT | Sky Sports

Match Prediction


  • Total voters
    72
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

bingobob

A-M’s Resident Hunskelper
Trusted ⭐

Country: Scotland
Rodri and Mahrez were both £60m, Auba was £55m no?
Yup and Pepe was more than them all at 70m.

Realistically we could have a front 4 that cost £215m but we sure as hell dont play like we do. Because the cost of a squad doesnt indicate quality or ability it just tells us what clubs were willing to spend and sell a player for.
 

Ac3knight

Active Member
he had nearly no time for Norwich and Brighton.
He won away against West Ham and a loss against City was expected, doesn't matter which coach.

The board f*cked it up with the international break, where they haven't decide to sack Emery.
Should've gotten mou
 

Gooner_girl14

Active Member
How are you defending ESR... he has done nothing. He even runs and press weaker than Özil and he has played 15 min.

The game's gone. Özil always has a target on his back due to his wages, and he wasn't having a great game. I'm not sure what Freddie was going for bringing ESR on instead of Laca, but it's likely not to matter one bit anyway.
 

CJJ

Established Member
What i find unforgiving is the fact that city doesn't even look like they're having a hard time. They are legit just taking the piss atm and ensuring they keep a 0.
 

bingobob

A-M’s Resident Hunskelper
Trusted ⭐

Country: Scotland
Don't forget 25M for that useless crock Tierney.

Lucky if a Championship team takes him on loan.
I'm hearing more league 1 or Holland. And they wont pay a fee or a percentage of his wages. Screwed royally.
 

Yousif Arsenal

On Vinai's payroll & misses 4th place trophy 🏆
Trusted ⭐
You can't blame fans being toxic they completely fed up with these players no effort or desire at all when you show that supporters will go behind you
 

Furious

Emery Gone, Telly Back On
Yup and Pepe was more than them all at 70m.

Realistically we could have a front 4 that cost £215m but we sure as hell dont play like we do. Because the cost of a squad doesnt indicate quality or ability it just tells us what clubs were willing to spend and sell a player for.

This is all very true.

Celtic did some incredible business selling us a crock in Tierney.
 

field442

Hates Journalists Named James
Trusted ⭐
he had nearly no time for Norwich and Brighton.
He won away against West Ham and a loss against City was expected, doesn't matter which coach.

The board f*cked it up with the international break, where they haven't decide to sack Emery.

The no time thing is a weak argument. Duncan Ferguson had the same amount of time and managed to beat Chelsea and draw at Old Trafford. Ljungberg has come in trying to get them playing free flowing football when he should be trying to make them solid at the back. It's like Benitez said on MNF, you'll always have a chance to score with your skill players in attack. If you make yourself compact and hard to break down that's half the battle won.
 

Makingtrax

Worships in the house of Wenger 🙏
Trusted ⭐

Country: England

Player:Saliba
Martinelli cost us 7m does that represent his current value? Squad cost is a nothing argument. It negates value added or lost. Mustafi and Xhaka 70m be lucky to get half that back.
:lol::lol::lol::lol:
You can't still be pedalling that sh!te. If teams could just buy £7m players and win the league, why aren't they?
 

EmeryCouldnt

Established Member
For any argument of squad cost etc let's just ask of these two teams who has the most expensive player?

This is a funny argument. No one is saying that paying more for a player makes them better. The squad cost argument is that if you have the ability to pay more money, you are more able to buy the best players. You disagree with that?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom