Country: Scotland
The issue is trax is so dogmatic in his views that the way its presented to me is squad cost team spends the most finishes 1, team finishes 2nd spent 2nd most and so on in sequence.
Will teams that spend more be successful, potentially, of course in theory they can access a better calibre of player. But money is well spread throughout the game now and lots of teams are spending money on duds and lots of teams are spending money on good and better players. And with lots of teams spending lots of money there will be an interesting mix. So it's not necessarily an argument of squad cost but who uses resources best.
Will teams that spend more be successful, potentially, of course in theory they can access a better calibre of player. But money is well spread throughout the game now and lots of teams are spending money on duds and lots of teams are spending money on good and better players. And with lots of teams spending lots of money there will be an interesting mix. So it's not necessarily an argument of squad cost but who uses resources best.