Country: England
As much as I like him probably not?Would you pay £42.5m for Ødegaard?
Wouldn't lose sleep if the club did it though. As long as CM and RB gets done.
As much as I like him probably not?Would you pay £42.5m for Ødegaard?
I like the kid but €50m is just laughable. Dont think anybody will pay that for a Norwegian kid who never got a look in and has constantly been on loan. They will bite our hand off at €35m end of the window.Would you pay £42.5m for Ødegaard?
I think 42M is a bargain myself. If we’re not getting an elite creator like Grealish I’d rather spend that than blowing our load on an inferior player in Maddison.
A bit long to comb through one by one but Chelsea 1 nil W, Ødegaard did 90 mins.Which one's? Sorry if that's the case.
Yh just found the Chelsea one, we played 3 at the back with the two 8's that day so a bit of a weird one. He didn't start against palace though my man.A bit long to comb through one by one but Chelsea 1 nil W, Ødegaard did 90 mins.
Started against Palace too 3-1 W too. On deeper inspection they only really got separated after their respective injuries and even then it was mostly during the latter stages of Europa.
Why do you think Maddison is inferior to Ødegaard? Everything points towards Maddison being the better more ready made player.
Dont know mate he doesnt excite me tbhWould you pay £42.5m for Ødegaard?
My mistake, but yeah I don't think that spreadsheet proves anything it leaves a lot to the imagination. Doesn't take into account formation, personnel and really it's splitting hairs remembering who started and who got subbed.Yh just found the Chelsea one, we played 3 at the back with the two 8's that day so a bit of a weird one. He didn't start against palace though my man.
Remember when Real Madrid had a 7.5m clause in Casemiro’s contract?
Can see them doing something petty like that.
You say he’s better at racking up goals and assists but I don’t even think we know this yet. I’d of loved to see Ødegaard playing for a really well put together and cohesive team after 3 years of PL experience.I meant Maddison is inferior to Grealish, Bruno, KDB etc.
70M for me is what you spend on an elite player, not someone who’s unlikely to get double digits in goals or assists and has a serious red flag with a hip issue that kills careers in many sports.
He’s better at MØ in terms of racking up goals and assists but in terms of technical ability, building plays from deep and playing out of presses MØ is clear. xGbuildup stats tend to back this up.
Personally I think the fee being bandied around is a bit of gamesmanship from Real Madrid.
£35m should get the job done. Better deal than spending virtually double that for Maddison.
That’s the one invoice I will be happy to process at this ****ing job.Just send them an email asking for a payment order and be done with it.
I wasn't really looking to **** on either player. It seemed to me a number of posters in this thread were reaching back to games they couldn't quite remember when making their point so I thought reposting the results could be a useful aide. I think it's worthwhile to try to take the emotion out of it by just looking at the results unfettered by the rollercoaster of emotions we were feeling at the time. I don't think there are any other mistakes though.My mistake, but yeah I don't think that spreadsheet proves anything it leaves a lot to the imagination. Doesn't take into account formation, personnel and really it's splitting hairs remembering who started and who got subbed.
Their actions per 90 would be a better gauge if you really wanted to sh*t on one or the other.
Exactly. Aouar, Nkunku, Olmo, Fritz, Perrera, Suso, Silva, etcSo there are only two attacking midfielders in world football. Maddison and Ødegaard.
Id pay £50m if the deal included Willian going the other wayWould you pay £42.5m for Ødegaard?