What are we 'waiting' for ?
No criticism as I actually don’t mind Pepe being included but it’s pretty unrealistic to have him part of our plans since he’s clearly not trusted by our manager.
It's an odd one because Vieira looks like a bit of a luxury signing squad wise but his raw talent could be insane just going off the last 12 months that he's had... Might not survive first contact with the PL, but he could look like a bargain at £30m. Chelsea have got a brilliant player as well in Raphinha but they've very much paid the price for it. I think we ultimately just weren't quite attractive enough to see off the level of interest in him this time. Want to see what the Plan B is - personally never thought that we'd land both Raph + Tielemans so if we prioritise Youri now then that would be brilliant.I get what you're saying, but was Vieira necessary for 30m when our priority should be improving the starting 11? He may well end up being a player, but this season, he'll very much be eased in. I've not actually seen him play so don't want to say too much, but doesn't it make more sense to spend extra to get the 2 or 3 top level players to elevate us.
Two parts to the agreement, the club and the player. It seems that the player must also agree. It is possible that Edu’s BBQ’s are more appealing.
What are we 'waiting' for ?
If Vieira can beat players off the dribble, its much harder to mark him out of match. If so, he could upgrade Ødegaard.It's an odd one because Vieira looks like a bit of a luxury signing squad wise but his raw talent could be insane just going off the last 12 months that he's had... Might not survive first contact with the PL, but he could look like a bargain at £30m. Chelsea have got a brilliant player as well in Raphinha but they've very much paid the price for it. I think we ultimately just weren't quite attractive enough to see off the level of interest in him this time. Want to see what the Plan B is - personally never thought that we'd land both Raph + Tielemans so if we prioritise Youri now then that would be brilliant.
I wanted Gnabry too but if the salary is north of £400k it doesn't seem as likely that we'd break our wage structure for him. Like you said these sort of moves often end quite badly, but if we had £55m + wages ready for the Raph deal, part of me thinks what's the problem with paying the same for Gnabry as the total package. Think we get hung up on whether the money goes to the selling club or the player tbh. It's all the same pot of money at the end of the day. Give Gnabry a £30m signing on fee + £150k a week, that's a pretty hard offer to turn downRaphinha would have been the better signing. On the ascension and Arsenal would have been cultivating a decent chunk of the Brazilian NT front line with him here.
Gnabry just looking for the bag at this point of his career, I'd only be in favour of bringing him if an equally big name came alongside him to ease the pressure on him a bit.
This conversation is pointless because you are obviously not one for logic, who said we are spending 60 million just on depth ?, Maybe you don't understand the difference between player's that are filler players used for depth,Are you seriously paying 60m for depth at RW. Are you an Arsenal fan historically or did you move over from City, Chelsea, United? 60m is a starter at Arsenal, without question. Where do you move star-boy, player of the year x2, Saka?
You need to join this reality. We do not have that type of budget for depth, as you can see, so we’ll need to be a little smarter.
Lets hear your logic..backed by an Arsenal budget.
Its not about me, so best to check your personal attacks.This conversation is pointless because you are obviously not one for logic, who said we are spending 60 million just on depth ?, Maybe you don't understand the difference between player's that are filler players used for depth,
ie. Your Tavares, Lakonga's, El neny's, and actual squad depth used to improve the overall quality, and whose to say saka and Raphinha couldn't have played in the same team, or are you also limited to just thinking Saka can play on the right, also We paid 70 million for pepe and he can't even get into the team,
It's because of fans like you with 0 aspirations of being better, is the reason this club languishes in the also rans of this league who are happy to pick up their participation trophy for best *Vibes and pseudo youth projects, hearing you waffle on about STAR BOY saka and his x2 player of the year in a team that finished 8th and 5th voted by the fans is honestly doing my head in...
What are we 'waiting' for ?
Wow I'm actually quite astonished at what I'm reading, you're either trolling or extremely dense.Its not about me, so best to check your personal attacks.
You basically explained nothing other than you prefer having this player. Fairly obvious you are not a Saka fan. You have no answer to where the player will play and why he is a 60m priority and why we would consider moving a very successful player out to accommodate, and how we can afford such a luxury.
Bored already. Moving on.
An Amazon subscription to watch the new Bumteta series... All or nothing!
What are we 'waiting' for ?
Does Gnabry speak Portuguese? If the answer is no there you have why. Edu only speaks in Portuguese at the phone.I wanted Gnabry too but if the salary is north of £400k it doesn't seem as likely that we'd break our wage structure for him. Like you said these sort of moves often end quite badly, but if we had £55m + wages ready for the Raph deal, part of me thinks what's the problem with paying the same for Gnabry as the total package. Think we get hung up on whether the money goes to the selling club or the player tbh. It's all the same pot of money at the end of the day. Give Gnabry a £30m signing on fee + £150k a week, that's a pretty hard offer to turn down
I don't think fans are the reason of nothing at all... Or do you think Artera and Edu ar reading this, make an analysis and say... See AM posters are saying we don't need Raphinha... Don't sign him. Only here to blame are Edu, Arteta and the owner. Use your neurons.This conversation is pointless because you are obviously not one for logic, who said we are spending 60 million just on depth ?, Maybe you don't understand the difference between player's that are filler players used for depth,
Ie. Your Tavares, Lakonga's, El neny's, and actual squad depth used to improve the overall quality of the squad, and whose to say saka and Raphinha couldn't have played in the same team, or are you also limited to just thinking Saka can play on the right, also We paid 70 million for pepe and he can't even get into the team,
It's because of fans like you with 0 aspirations of being better, is the reason this club languishes in the also rans of this league who are happy to pick up their participation trophy for best *Vibes and pseudo youth projects, hearing you waffle on about STAR BOY saka and his x2 player of the year in a team that finished 8th and 5th voted by the fans is honestly doing my head in...
Ok another dense one, did I actually say the "fans" are the reason for our failure to aquire raphina ?, or did I say the fans have a lack of ambition and are content with the status quo, is this a visual impairment issue or reading comprehension ?, I'm not sure.I don't think fans are the reason of nothing at all... Or do you think Artera and Edu ar reading this, make an analysis and say... See AM posters are saying we don't need Raphinha... Don't sign him. Only here to blame are Edu, Arteta and the owner. Use your neurons.
Wow dense? Is that new word you learned? Good to see you have a new dictionary!Ok another dense one, did I actually say the "fans" are the reason for our failure to aquire raphina ?, or did I say the fans have a lack of ambition and are content with the status quo, is this a visual impairment issue or reading comprehension ?, I'm not sure.
And believe me, if I as fan would have any sort of influence or whatever... Xhaka would be cleaning the bathrooms with his tongue and nothing more.Ok another dense one, did I actually say the "fans" are the reason for our failure to aquire raphina ?, or did I say the fans have a lack of ambition and are content with the status quo, is this a visual impairment issue or reading comprehension ?, I'm not sure.
In times like this you really hope he cooked that meat to perfection when Raphinha was around.Two parts to the agreement, the club and the player. It seems that the player must also agree. It is possible that Edu’s BBQ’s are more appealing.
I wouldn’t hold my breath though.