good start to the season look playing him as LW getting best out of him
It's annoying because I think he's more naturally suited to that wide left role than Auba but we can't accommodate Lacazette without playing Auba on the wing.
More like we can't accommodate Auba without playing him on the wing cos he hasn't been threatening enough at CF when he's played there while Laca tears it up there!It's annoying because I think he's more naturally suited to that wide left role than Auba but we can't accommodate Lacazette without playing Auba on the wing.
More like we can't accommodate Auba without playing him on the wing cos he hasn't been threatening enough at CF when he's played there while Laca tears it up there!
It's an issue isn't it? Auba just can't handle the conventional 9..can't hold and doesn't press . Maybe hold if he drifted like Titi did.
As for the pressing: Auba has pressed under Klopp and Tuchel. Saying he can't do it per se is a weird statement. I'd much rather say that the collective and cohesive pressing isn't really working for the team as a whole as of now and we will probably see it get better over the course of the season.
can Laca press?
The answer to that would be a resounding Yes! I have seen him pressing and hustling opposition defenses, which basically is what you want in a CF, well of course he also has to be good at holding up play, have good close control, first touch, an eye for goal and a cool finish; attributes which I'd say Laca excels at IMO. As @Toby Andrl posted, both Laca and Auba pressed in the little time both were on the pitch together in the first two games. The problem seems to be the latter games when the only pressing I have seen has been sporadic from all our offensive players, which easily allows opposition players to easily contain the supposed press. I wouldn't speak for the boss, but am guessing the reasons behind his sporadic pressing depending on certain games could be:It's an issue isn't it? Auba just can't handle the conventional 9..can't hold and doesn't press . Maybe hold if he drifted like Titi did.
The thing is he's paired with different players here. Reus and whoever Dortmund played on the right side (usually Mkhitaryan or Blaszczykowski) would behave differently than the guys he's paired with here. Reus is a quick attacker, almost a second striker or striker himself - Iwobi doesn't provide that from the left, and neither does Welbeck really. Kuba was quite a straightforward workhorse running the lines mostly - and we haven't got a player of that mold on our right side. Right now there's Özil who drifts in and plays as a 10 in the half spaces.
I didn't quite watch Dortmund in those days but if what you are saying is true, as in he excelled on the right side at BVB, it could have been the perfect reasoning for the acquisition of a Zaha type who is fast, good technically, can beat opponents, and most importantly is a winger and would ideally have helped in getting the best out of Laca and Auba.Another thing to factor in is the specific gegenpressing style: you win the ball high up the pitch and brake instantly with as much pace as possible - that's golden for a guy like Aubameyang. Tuchel's style got a bit more patient and focused on possession, and incidentally Auba often took on the role of a fox in the box, or he was shifted to the right side, from which he would drift in with speed and unmarked. That wasn't a long term option for BvB as they didn't have a proper CF to accomodate that spot, but Arsenal have. Emery's style is closer to Tuchel's than to Klopp's. It's one of the factors why Auba is more dangerous on the wing for us - and Arsenal have the CF that allows us to play him on the left or right.
Iwobi gells so much better with Aubameyang than Alexis. Him leaving done the club a world of good.
Iwobi gells so much better with Aubameyang than Alexis. Him leaving done the club a world of good.
Still don't understand the thread title.
When life brings you down, no better remedy than the Alexis thread on Redcafe.Alexis being piss poor at United makes it even better
So it's racist.In firearms, a safety or safety catch is a mechanism used to help prevent the accidental discharge of a firearm, helping to ensure safer handling.
So it's racist.