I guess that's a better reason than the alleged dog video
How is this fair? Should be all or none.
Can we start a thread on VAR.
VAR is pointless if the refs decide self what incident to review and what not. Captains need to get 1-2 call for VAR per half.
I will take this over no touch diving, penalty seeking simulating con artists .Maybe if it was implemented like this, with each captain having the right to ask for one VAR reviewing per game, and the refs having no right to resort to it otherwise, it could be good. Right now, I find it annoying, it destroys the game for me. Breaks the rhythm of matches to a stupid extent and still doesn't bring justice, because a lot of what is wrong with refereeing is little decisions that will never get reviewed.
I'm for it if it's done right. Not botched like brexit.
Yup, like CricketMaybe if it was implemented like this, with each captain having the right to ask for one VAR reviewing per game, and the refs having no right to resort to it otherwise, it could be good. Right now, I find it annoying, it destroys the game for me. Breaks the rhythm of matches to a stupid extent and still doesn't bring justice, because a lot of what is wrong with refereeing is little decisions that will never get reviewed.
Also if decision is wrong for handball.Var can work well if its implemented right. If a ref feels he's made the right decision he probably wont turn to Var so that needs changing. Maybe the panel who are presumably linked to the refs ear piece can just butt in if they see its wrong rather than waiting for him to call for Var. This must only be for penalty decisions & ball crossing the line, if you use it more the game wouldn't flow.