qs
Established Member
Jameel46 said:1. Walcott hasn't even come close to what Gallas has achieved in his career.
What Gallas has achieved for Chelsea, France and others is irrelevant. He's achieved nothing for us and I'm much more interested in in what Gallas and Walcott will achieve. Clearly Walcott will achieve more in the future.
Jameel46 said:2. Gallas' importance to the defence (like him or not) is a hell of a lot more than Walcott's importance to the attack.
Not at all. Our attack has been in terrible form since Walcott got injured. When Toure and Djourou partnered up our defence was as good as with Gallas in.
Jameel46 said:you seriously need to look harder at the comparisons you're making before voicing them.
Maybe you should look at yours. Gallas has been a negative influence on this club, he's a player in decline. How does that warrant more money than a player who is getting better and better as time goes by. A player Capello called Englands greatest talent.
Maybe you should stop living in the past.