- Thread starter
- #221
Honestly, I completely agree with the thread title. Those who sold their souls. For some reason, I don't think they're anywhere as near as dislikeable as Chelsea.
Well, Chelsea had nothing at all to sell.
Honestly, I completely agree with the thread title. Those who sold their souls. For some reason, I don't think they're anywhere as near as dislikeable as Chelsea.
Injured till April at the earliest.What on earth ever happened to Nasri?
So the great title favorites have failed to win any of their last 6 away games.
Their goal against us was the only away goal since September.
Their home form is really something to fear. If that has any cracks soon we are easily the favorites.The media really love the flavour of the moment approach, some quarters now saying that City wont win the title
City still clear favourites for me, they have tremendous quality within their ranks and should be out front by now.
I just hope we can stay near the top and also ensure that we are comfortably clear of them when its time to go to the Etihad.
The media really love the flavour of the moment approach, some quarters now saying that City wont win the title
City still clear favourites for me, they have tremendous quality within their ranks and should be out front by now.
I just hope we can stay near the top and also ensure that we are comfortably clear of them when its time to go to the Etihad.
Makes sense. Mangala sucks.Wonder if they'll invest in January.
Would be a decent time for them to go for Stones; Everton conceding like **** makes him look bad, he'll be inflated to 100M by the time the Euros start and Mangala is a joke.
Wonder if they'll invest in January.
Would be a decent time for them to go for Stones; Everton conceding like **** makes him look bad, he'll be inflated to 100M by the time the Euros start and Mangala is a joke.
Everyone thinks City got the best squad, which they probably marginally do, but even they need to refresh in a lot of positions.
Probably need two new fullbacks, a Yaya replacement, perhaps another CM and CB and they could with an attacking player since they've only got Navas as cover.
I don't think they do, they have a classy line of attackers when they're all fit, but the rest of the team isn't all that to be honest.
I think we have the best squad in the league, we maybe lack a world class striker and some defensive depth, but in the big picture I think we have the highest quality squad.
It's easy for some people to think that since City has a £300m+ squad that undoubtedly equals quality, but as they so willingly have shown it necessarily doesn't.
Would we exchange Per and Koscielny for Kompany and Mangala?
Hart for Cech?
Silva for Özil?
Giroud for Agüero?
De Bruyne for Alexis?
I wouldn't.
They haven't been able to upgrade/replace the core of that team. It's essentially the same team that's been running things for the last 5 years and it's getting old & keeps breaking down.Think Otamendi will turn it around.
But the rest of their whole backline won't last, they are all relatively the same age as well. Replacing them all at the same time and building an understanding will be the trickiest aspect for them. Obviously worth keeping some for depth but you'd be lucky if this gets you past this season.
Kolarov 30, Sagna 32, Zabaleta 30, Kompany 29, Mangala ****.
That was just a little jokeAn injury free Aguero?
Depends, will Pellegrini be given the funds to invest in "his players" if the rumors about Pep arriving in the summer are true? Considering how much money has already been wasted on there defense, do they really want to blow another £30M,£40M, £50M on CBs?Wonder if they'll invest in January.
Would be a decent time for them to go for Stones; Everton conceding like **** makes him look bad, he'll be inflated to 100M by the time the Euros start and Mangala is a joke.