Mancheater City: 115

[Highbury_2006]

Finally buy 1st place? I'm sure 2012 and 2014 were pre-Pep, as was 1968 and 1937.

Yeah, i am sure that you would have won in 2012 and 2014 without the sheik.

 

[al-Ustaadh]

Questionable deals with Qatar?

News to me, care to point those out for me? Or is this just another figment of your wild imagination?

Not Qatar. UAE, in particular Abu Dhabi. My bad.

 

[YeahBee]

Questionable deals with Qatar?

News to me, care to point those out for me? Or is this just another figment of your wild imagination?

how can a deal with Qatar not be questionable?

 

[al-Ustaadh]

how can a deal with Qatar not be questionable?

It wasn’t Qatar (that’s PSG). I meant the UAE, particularly Abu Dhabi.

 

[YeahBee]

It wasn’t Qatar (that’s PSG). I meant the UAE, particularly Abu Dhabi.

same ****




I hate the fact we are playing at the Emirates and wear it on our shirts

 

[al-Ustaadh]

Credible foresight, that deal is under-valued now. More fool us signing a ten year deal. Don't forget, they sponsor the stadium, shirts AND CFA.

Lol I’m not allowed to have foresight but all of the sudden Man City can? Get the **** out of here.

 

[Juan Matas Beard]

same ****




I hate the fact we are playing at the Emirates and wear it on our shirts

Tbf, on the Selena Gomez one. If she can't respect the rules of a Mosque she shouldn't go.

 

[YeahBee]

Tbf, on the Selena Gomez one. If she can't respect the rules of a Mosque she shouldn't go.

yes I kinda agree, but just wanted a video to show their religious fundamentalism

it may look like a modern country but it is not under the glamour

I wouldn't go into a church in a speedo either but an ankle should be fine for any religion

Heck I have skulls, heavy metal, an runic tattoos that show and I have been into churches,, temples, synagogues and mosques here in Sweden and abroad and nobody has said anything

wasn't allowed into a bathhouse in Japan thou

 

[krackpot]

yes I kinda agree, but just wanted a video to show their religious fundamentalism

it may look like a modern country but it is not under the glamour

I wouldn't go into a church in a speedo either but an ankle should be fine for any religion

muslim here...people get away with laughing, screaming, crying, accidental nudity. It's about the intention, not just the action.

prayers need concentration as you need to mentally count the number of times you have to prostrate, etc. Some of the things that ruin my prayers:

• when someone fell down
• I stood behind some guy wearing sheer/thin/tight pants
• someone having a lot of tats would get me fixated on him
• my children fighting
• someone talking in a funny voice/accent

if someone literally lifted their abaya (burqa) nearby to where i was praying, you would be sure I would get distracted and also start cursing them in my prayers and get distracted even more.

Anyway, this is not the time or place. Stick to football, please.

 

[Makingtrax]

Most football supporters are only focussed on one thing, tribalistic glory, winning.

City have finally bought that success, They have acquired the richest team ever to grace the Prem and the most expensive manager. The fans now couldn't give a **** about human rights or where the money comes from . . . they've got their fix. That's the reality of football in a male dominated social culture.

 

[A Lighter Shade of Blue]

Yeah, i am sure that you would have won in 2012 and 2014 without the sheik.

The reply was about Pep, please try and understand the English language.

 

[A Lighter Shade of Blue]

Lol I’m not allowed to have foresight but all of the sudden Man City can? Get the **** out of here.

Etihad, not City. Again somebody that cannot understand a simple statement.

 

[al-Ustaadh]

Etihad, not City. Again somebody that cannot understand a simple statement.

Two parties to a deal. City greatly benefited then, and still benefits now from it compared to naming rights deals of other top clubs.

And it doesn’t matter what value the deal may have now. Still questionable given the connections involved. That’s a **** ton of money that helps buy full backs at the cost of entire EPL squads.

Also, you just may not be a good writer. Thus the confusion on occasion.

 

[A Lighter Shade of Blue]

Two parties to a deal. And City greatly benefited then, and still benefits from it compared to other top clubs now.

Also, you just may not be a good writer. Thus the confusion.

It's quite obvious the foresight was by Etihad, as the deal is under-valued now. I write/type in laymans terms, if you find that hard to understand, it's not down to me.

Any new agreement would probably net around an extra 50% on the current terms, so Etihad have got a very good deal out of it.

It's really not difficult to understand.

 

[al-Ustaadh]

It's quite obvious the foresight was by Etihad, as the deal is under-valued now. I write/type in laymans terms, if you find that hard to understand, it's not down to me.

Any new agreement would probably net around an extra 50% on the current terms, so Etihad have got a very good deal out of it.

It's really not difficult to understand.

Go back and read. Edited it before you responded.

 

[al-Ustaadh]

Etihad, not City. Again somebody that cannot understand a simple statement.

Also, it’s human apes all the way around. If even the apes of Etihad can have foresight, then why not I another ape?

 

[A Lighter Shade of Blue]

Go back and read. Edited it before you responded.

Again, you are completely wrong, Etihad have benefitted more than City, the last 3-4 years, that deal has been seriously under-valued, as has Arsenal's with Emirates. That's the danger of signing long-term deals.

 

[al-Ustaadh]

Again, you are completely wrong, Etihad have benefitted more than City, the last 3-4 years, that deal has been seriously under-valued, as has Arsenal's with Emirates. That's the danger of signing long-term deals.

You keep avoiding the issue of the legality and fairness of the deal. But that’s cool. We can stop there.

 

[al-Ustaadh]

 

[SA Gunner]

Im so glad that City finally lost that unbeaten run.

Its a timely reminder of how great the Invincibles were back then, especially now for the @A Lighter Shade of Blue and the rest of the Bluemoon brigade.