Smoke bomb post. This was just about the arms dealing assertions, which are most definitely true. Not concerned with the other **** you want to point out, as it isn't relevant to what I was talking about in other posts, i.e. human rights violations and arms dealing.
Actually, the correct terminology is smokescreen, not smoke bomb. And absolutely not is it a smokescreen post. You obviously didn’t read the second paragraph where I not only acknowledged the arms dealing but also stated I find the UAE siding with Saudi out of order - what part of the following constitutes a smokescreen in your opinion?
The arms dealing you refer to I’ve already acknowledged in my other post. I can’t confess to knowing enough about the situation in Yemen but I do think that the UAE siding with Saudi smacks of sucking up to a more powerful nation. Ditto their alliance against Qatar which itself is hardly exempt from criticism but it’s a bit rich for Saudi to take the moral high ground against Qatar and it’s not good that the UAE has sided with Saudi against Qatar.
To be honest, if you’re using McGeehan as a wholly factual source of information then that’s a mistake. You shouldn’t believe everything you read on Twitter just because it suits your narrative.
Seeing as you’re so hung up on what goes on in that part of the world, and seeing as though many top European clubs are balls deep in ownership and sponsorship deals in that part of the world, I’m sure you wouldn’t mind confirming on here that you’ve vehemently been opposed to Arsenal’s sponsorship deal with Emirates ever since the day it was signed, given that the people that own Emirates are related to City’s owner so they’re all effectively pissing in the same pot. So go on - and no smokescreens or gymnastics.....