- Thread starter
- #1,921
Country: England
Don't see why we'd accept that money when it's basically what Wolves offered.
Did we not hold interest in Tagliafico at one point? Thinking of left back alternatives that could potentially come in.
No chance we're selling AMN especially to a top 4 rival.
There's no logic in strengthening a rival with one of our best players especially when we're in no rush to sell him.
One of our best players - how? He has great stamina and attitude, but he is so poor on the ball in smaller spaces. He could be a useful squad player, so I’m against selling. But he is really too limited on the ball to be one of our best players.No chance we're selling AMN especially to a top 4 rival.
There's no logic in strengthening a rival with one of our best players especially when we're in no rush to sell him.
One of our best players - how? He has great stamina and attitude, but he is so poor on the ball in smaller spaces. He could be a useful squad player, so I’m against selling. But he is really too limited on the ball to be one of our best players.
The fact is he isn't one of our best players though...
It's not a fact, it's your opinion.
One of our best players - how? He has great stamina and attitude, but he is so poor on the ball in smaller spaces. He could be a useful squad player, so I’m against selling. But he is really too limited on the ball to be one of our best players.
How can you say he's one of our best players? He wouldn't start at left back, right back or midfield in a 433, which is where we want to be. He starts at LWB because he's currently the only one who can really play there aside from Saka, but he has a bigger engine than Saka which helps in big games.
The guy is borderline useless technically, athletic and a physical presence but that clearly doesn't make him one of our best players.
Your statements are outrageous sometimes.
This in iteslf is an outrageous statement.