ArsenesCoatMaker
Established Member
He didn’t struggle badly
I thought struggled was being kind (ignore the dubbing)
He didn’t struggle badly
I thought struggled was being kind (ignore the dubbing)
Going to chase Rodrygo on loan all month only to for him to come out and fight for his place.
This kid got manhandled out there. Doubt he will play much for Sunderland after a few PL games.Came on midway through the second half and had a hand in two goals, I’d take that
i predict Endrick to be Arsenal in first week of january window on loan. if we don't have some big injures and our attack did do well so i expect us do nothing.
but overall there won't be players available in this window i only predicting the likes of Endrick because of his lack game time at Madrid when January comes and he'll be asking to leave on loan.
Rodrygo won't be needed unless he really in top condition he been 12 months without football however Endrick will be hungry to prove a point about why real madrid not using him even tho it's clear why they not using him and he should have left in summerI think Endrick and possibly Rodrygo might be 2 who might be available, for the reason you say about Endrick, and because Madrid might be happy letting Rodrygo leave to build up his fitness after just returning from an ACL.
Whether we want to be the team to see him through that phase, I'm not sure.
Edit: Rodrygo just started jogging out on the grass last week, so not even sure he'd be ready for games in January time.
I think Endrick and possibly Rodrygo might be 2 who might be available, for the reason you say about Endrick, and because Madrid might be happy letting Rodrygo leave to build up his fitness after just returning from an ACL.
Whether we want to be the team to see him through that phase, I'm not sure.
Edit: Rodrygo just started jogging out on the grass last week, so not even sure he'd be ready for games in January time.
But we just spent an entire transfer window doing the opposite of this
I thought struggled was being kind (ignore the dubbing)
Just shows how bad our sales has been
I like to think Kroupi would have been a target in the summer if it wasn’t for his injury. The problem is, where have we set our price ceiling? He had a great season but he’s also a good example of price increasing while not playing. How high will we go? To get him in Jan might mean paying even more.
Why? Because he’s a young attacking player with big potential and PL experience. Why wouldn’t we be interested?Why? He only got injured mid summer and we’
showed no interest in him to that point.
Why? Because he’s a young attacking player with big potential and PL experience. Why wouldn’t we be interested?
| Team | P | W | D | L | Goals | GD | Pts | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Manchester City
W
W
W
W
W
|
5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 13:5 | +8 | 15 | |
| 2 |
Arsenal
W
L
W
W
W
W
|
6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 10:5 | +5 | 15 | |
| 3 |
Brighton
W
W
W
D
L
W
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 18:5 | +13 | 13 | |
| 4 |
Brentford
D
W
D
D
D
W
|
6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 12:6 | +6 | 10 | |
| 5 |
Chelsea
W
L
D
L
W
W
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 15:13 | +2 | 10 | |
| 6 |
Leeds
L
D
W
D
D
W
|
6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8:5 | +3 | 9 | |
| 7 |
Liverpool
W
D
W
D
D
|
5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 7:4 | +3 | 9 | |
| 8 |
Everton
W
D
D
D
W
|
5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 6:3 | +3 | 9 | |
| 9 |
Ipswich
W
L
W
L
L
W
|
6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9:12 | -3 | 9 | |
| 10 |
Hull
L
D
D
W
W
|
5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6:4 | +2 | 8 | |
| 11 |
Newcastle
W
L
D
W
D
|
5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9:9 | 0 | 8 | |
| 12 |
Manchester United
D
D
L
D
W
L
|
6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 9:9 | 0 | 6 | |
| 13 |
Nottingham Forest
L
W
D
D
L
|
5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4:5 | -1 | 5 | |
| 14 |
Aston Villa
D
W
L
D
L
L
|
6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6:11 | -5 | 5 | |
| 15 |
Crystal Palace
D
L
W
L
L
|
5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6:11 | -5 | 4 | |
| 16 |
Sunderland
L
L
L
D
W
L
|
6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6:12 | -6 | 4 | |
| 17 |
Bournemouth
L
L
D
D
D
L
|
6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7:13 | -6 | 3 | |
| 18 |
Tottenham
D
L
D
D
L
L
|
6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3:9 | -6 | 3 | |
| 19 |
Coventry
W
L
L
L
L
|
5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1:10 | -9 | 3 | |
| 20 |
Fulham
L
D
D
L
L
L
|
6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6:10 | -4 | 2 |