Country: Brazil
Micky don’t want Barcola. We’ve not even been linked really.
Think he would like him, it's just that 150m euro for him is a no no from Josh.
Micky don’t want Barcola. We’ve not even been linked really.
We are if Saka is fit, imo.
Haven't retained the league in forever (1930s?), but everyone's defense is kind of iffy as far as the top teams go.
Attack will be the difference, which is a pickle for us in and of itself.
I don’t mind that, that’s a ridiculous price for him.Think he would like him, it's just that 150m euro for him is a no no from Josh.
Both are a big miss but Saliba is the worst for me, he really seems to stabilize Gabriel in a way where they compliment each other perfectly but there clearly is a dropoff from Gabriel when they don't play together.We will have to be rock solid defensively again as our attackers are not at the level of our rivals. Think that will be almost impossible to achieve without Saliba and potentially Timber.
I think the pursuit of Vini was probably equally about commercial value and sporting value. Barcola doesn't bring the commercial boom that Vini would have so the club are less willing to push the boat out for a player who might develop into a similar level of producer but who doesn't bring the added revenue and status. It's understandable but also a little disappointing because you do sometimes just have to push the boat out like with Rice.
Nah.They play totally different positions. It's Zubi or MLS if one is going.
Not sure what you are trying to say with this gif tbh
The Kroenke SpecialIt’s looking grim for me now. I don’t see what attacker we’re signing now that won’t be a settle job in some way.
Thinking we can sign Kvara or Doue is why people hate Arsenal fans
So basically a huge outlay to get an elite forward from a small group of clubs. I agree that's probably the only way to get a player like that. It's also very easy for most of these clubs to just say no since they don't need the money and not hard for them to convince players to stay either. Juve maybe not the same as these others tbh, they would be harder pressed if we went after Yildiz imo.Obviously not Mbappe, but Kvara, @A_G's boy Yildiz, Doue, even Barcola. It means going getting one of these guys that are "not for sale" and making them for sale.
Again, Alvarez is a good example. Eve though I don't see it with him and he wasn't so set on Barça, he'd be here.
Not every elite buy can be "Oh, Vini's not renewing, let's pounce".
At one point you need to raise the ceiling, and at CF and LW there's very little ceiling raisers to go around.
The alternative to this is taking a chance on an up and coming talent like Diomande or even Kroupi, but since we seem unwilling to take that chance, we're back to having to make the guys with elite attackers sell or waiting to get lucky that one of them become available.
I don’t mind that, that’s a ridiculous price for him.
It’s looking grim for me now. I don’t see what attacker we’re signing now that won’t be a settle job in some way.
Barcola is for sale thoughOr Barcola for 80 m.
Yeah it's the policy of neglecting a problem position every summer for years which has come home to roost. You get to a stage where there's a dearth of top class solutions on the market, inflation caused by average players going for stupid fees and then you're in a position where you either overpay now or overpay later.It's understandable, but we're partially culpable of being where we are.
Vini financials makes every other deal not seem worth it, and I agree with the club on that. 150m for a floor raiser (who could be a ceiling guy) is steep, but the alternative is getting a guy like Diomande or Godts and we seem even less inclined to do that.
The Kroenke Special
Yeah nobody wants to watch Neto, Havertz and Madueke though.Does it matter if we’re going to walk the league anyway?
CL is a long shot no matter who you sign.
| Team | P | W | D | L | Goals | GD | Pts | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Manchester City
W
W
W
W
W
|
5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 13:5 | +8 | 15 | |
| 2 |
Arsenal
W
L
W
W
W
W
|
6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 10:5 | +5 | 15 | |
| 3 |
Brighton
W
W
W
D
L
W
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 18:5 | +13 | 13 | |
| 4 |
Brentford
D
W
D
D
D
W
|
6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 12:6 | +6 | 10 | |
| 5 |
Chelsea
W
L
D
L
W
W
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 15:13 | +2 | 10 | |
| 6 |
Leeds
L
D
W
D
D
W
|
6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8:5 | +3 | 9 | |
| 7 |
Liverpool
W
D
W
D
D
|
5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 7:4 | +3 | 9 | |
| 8 |
Everton
W
D
D
D
W
|
5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 6:3 | +3 | 9 | |
| 9 |
Ipswich
W
L
W
L
L
W
|
6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9:12 | -3 | 9 | |
| 10 |
Hull
L
D
D
W
W
|
5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6:4 | +2 | 8 | |
| 11 |
Newcastle
W
L
D
W
D
|
5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9:9 | 0 | 8 | |
| 12 |
Manchester United
D
D
L
D
W
L
|
6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 9:9 | 0 | 6 | |
| 13 |
Nottingham Forest
L
W
D
D
L
|
5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4:5 | -1 | 5 | |
| 14 |
Aston Villa
D
W
L
D
L
L
|
6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6:11 | -5 | 5 | |
| 15 |
Crystal Palace
D
L
W
L
L
|
5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6:11 | -5 | 4 | |
| 16 |
Sunderland
L
L
L
D
W
L
|
6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6:12 | -6 | 4 | |
| 17 |
Bournemouth
L
L
D
D
D
L
|
6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7:13 | -6 | 3 | |
| 18 |
Tottenham
D
L
D
D
L
L
|
6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3:9 | -6 | 3 | |
| 19 |
Coventry
W
L
L
L
L
|
5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1:10 | -9 | 3 | |
| 20 |
Fulham
L
D
D
L
L
L
|
6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6:10 | -4 | 2 |