RacingPhoton
Established Member
Very Arsenal thing to do. Giving away Gnabry and scrambling for wingers later, giving away Martinez and scrambling for GKs now.
Yes. Except we didn't give Gnabry away.Very Arsenal thing to do. Giving away Gnabry and scrambling for wingers later, giving away Martinez and scrambling for GKs now.
Yes. Except we didn't give Gnabry away.
I'll reserve the judgement on Martinez for £20m until we've seen ~£7m Onana play for us if we sign him.
Both the transfers happened because we were not strong enough to give chances to them ahead of players who were worse.Yes. Except we didn't give Gnabry away.
I'll reserve the judgement on Martinez for £20m until we've seen ~£7m Onana play for us if we sign him.
Both the transfers happened because we were not strong enough to give chances to them ahead of players who were worse
€2m and you made the salary figure up. Not withstanding a shocking deal. I'd sack the goalkeeping coachDon't forget 4 M and 70k per week for 4 years for that loser Rúnarsson.
thats just money laundering / commission siphoningDon't forget 4 M and 70k per week for 4 years for that loser Rúnarsson.
Tapped? Why did he have to leave for Werder Bremen in the first place? Why did we loan him to a ****ing Pulis team before that?Rubbish. Gnabry was tapped up by Bayern during the Olympics.
We didn’t give Gnabry away, he didn’t want to extend his deal.Very Arsenal thing to do. Giving away Gnabry and scrambling for wingers later, giving away Martinez and scrambling for GKs now.
Bayern and Bremen had a deal made for Gnabry. Before that he wasn’t ready for us and was sent out on loan.Tapped? Why did he have to leave for Werder Bremen in the first place? Why did we loan him to a ****ing Pulis team before that?
In my opinion, we made a big mistake by sending him to a Pulis team for loan. "Gave him away" was the wrong phrase that I used because Wenger wanted him here. But he left because he was not getting enough chances here and the loan only made things worse.Bayern and Bremen had a deal made for Gnabry. Before that he wasn’t ready for us and was sent out on loan.
I remember debating with most of this forum, most felt he should be sold.
In my opinion, we made a big mistake by sending him to a Pulis team for loan. "Gave him away" was the wrong phrase that I used because Wenger wanted him here. But he left because he was not getting enough chances here and the loan only made things worse.
He went out after a serious injury that kept him out for 10 months, maybe West Brom and Pulis was the only club in for him, he was very very raw.In my opinion, we made a big mistake by sending him to a Pulis team for loan. "Gave him away" was the wrong phrase that I used because Wenger wanted him here. But he left because he was not getting enough chances here and the loan only made things worse.
Not a lot of bench warming. He played over 20 matches in Werder Bremen and Hoffenheim and scored over 10 goals in both. Either way, the initial transfer was to Werder Bremen. Bayern seemed to have played a role in it. They probably had an option to buy him from Werder Bremen. And going back to my initial question. Why did we send him to a Pulis team?What the hell are you on about?
He left because he was tapped up by a bigger club, Bayern.
But even after leaving he had to spend 2 years on loan and a lot of bench-warming while developing.
It was before. He got a long injury then Wenger sent him to Pulis.Gnabry also missed a whole season due to injury i think, after that he was sent on loan.
Just read wiki, sounds like it was before. He got a big injury, then Wenger sent him on loan.It was before. He got a long injury then Wenger sent him to Pulis.