Sanchez11
Fs FC
Country: England
I dont think we will buy him
I don’t really see that reasoning. I think people are getting too attached to symbolic things like that. If Barcola was not getting into the Madrid team because of Vinicius then people wouldn’t be saying it.Trying hard to forget about this guy - because we're trying to overtake PSG with their substitute player. Make it make sense.. ultimately they should be the benchmark, and if he's expendable there we shouldn't be drooling over him like this...
At the same time the potential of a Thierry-esque arch makes it difficult to look away..
A very bizarre line of thinking, honestly. That he's got heavy competition with one of the best in that role in the world - in the same team no less - should actually mean there's something in there to work with. I mean he was the man holding down that role before Kvara's arrival ffs. If anything he's got a point to prove like Alexis Sanchez did.I don’t really see that reasoning. I think people are getting too attached to symbolic things like that. If Barcola was not getting into the Madrid team because of Vinicius then people wouldn’t be saying it.
The fact is, how many times have we seen talented players not get enough game time at a team then explode after? We saw it ourselves with a player in the exact same position as Barcola, and the man was Alexis Sanchez. Palmer did it at Chelsea as well coming from City (slightly different circumstances I recognise).
It’s like people would rather go for a more risky or lower ceiling attacker just because they don’t play at PSG, due to the optics.
A very bizarre line of thinking, honestly. That he's got heavy competition with one of the best in that role in the world - in the same team no less - should actually mean there's something in there to work with. I mean he was the man holding down that role before Kvara's arrival ffs. If anything he's got a point to prove like Alexis Sanchez did.#
Maybe I'm hating, but so far I see this guy's profile more like a Cuadrado than a Thierry, Salah, or even Palmer. At the end of the day, you and me both don't have much to go by other than hopes. Either hopes that his finishing miraculously improves, or hopes that he joins us and magically clicks as Thierry did, and damn are those some big shoes to fill.I don’t really see that reasoning. I think people are getting too attached to symbolic things like that. If Barcola was not getting into the Madrid team because of Vinicius then people wouldn’t be saying it.
The fact is, how many times have we seen talented players not get enough game time at a team then explode after? We saw it ourselves with a player in the exact same position as Barcola, and the man was Alexis Sanchez. Palmer did it at Chelsea as well coming from City (slightly different circumstances I recognise).
It’s like people would rather go for a more risky or lower ceiling attacker just because they don’t play at PSG, due to the optics.
I see where you’re coming from that it’s still a gamble and could end up just paying a pretty serviceable winger and that’s it. But the other options out there are rubbish. If it’s not a silly fee I would be happy with Barcola.Maybe I'm hating, but so far I see this guy's profile more like a Cuadrado than a Thierry, Salah, or even Palmer. At the end of the day, you and me both don't have much to go by other than hopes. Either hopes that his finishing miraculously improves, or hopes that he joins us and magically clicks as Thierry did, and damn are those some big shoes to fill.
Since you believe in the redemption arc, allow me to sell you the Nico Williams project.I see where you’re coming from that it’s still a gamble and could end up just paying a pretty serviceable winger and that’s it. But the other options out there are rubbish. If it’s not a silly fee I would be happy with Barcola.
I would have actually been open to this but apparently he’s got really bad injury issues which requires surgery? Something like that at least.Since you believe in the redemption arc, allow me to sell you the Nico Williams project.
It's got hints of Dembele leaving Spain to completely dominate in a new environment. It's a risk yuno but we've seen him be a main guy before, just needs to stay fit imo. Would be an absolute statement though from us.
Since you believe in the redemption arc, allow me to sell you the Nico Williams project.
It's got hints of Dembele leaving Spain to completely dominate in a new environment. It's a risk yuno but we've seen him be a main guy before, just needs to stay fit imo. Would be an absolute statement though from us.
I would have actually been open to this but apparently he’s got really bad injury issues which requires surgery? Something like that at least.
Yeah, and that basically means he cannot be explosive and start stop often while dribbling.He's got pubalgia or whatever it is.
It is looking less and less likely, mainly as PSG are not keen on selling to us.Getting close to closing this thread. Barcola isn't coming.
He's got pubalgia or whatever it is.
Sure looks like Romano is teasing he's Liverpool bound.
Sure looks like Romano is teasing he's Liverpool bound.
For the umpteenth time.Trying hard to forget about this guy - because we're trying to overtake PSG with their substitute player. Make it make sense.. ultimately they should be the benchmark, and if he's expendable there we shouldn't be drooling over him like this...
At the same time the potential of a Thierry-esque arch makes it difficult to look away..
| Team | P | W | D | L | Goals | GD | Pts | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Arsenal
W
W
W
W
W
L
|
38 | 26 | 7 | 5 | 71:27 | +44 | 85 | |
| 2 |
Manchester City
L
D
W
W
D
W
|
38 | 23 | 9 | 6 | 77:35 | +42 | 78 | |
| 3 |
Manchester United
W
W
D
W
W
W
|
38 | 20 | 11 | 7 | 69:50 | +19 | 71 | |
| 4 |
Aston Villa
W
W
D
L
L
W
|
38 | 19 | 8 | 11 | 56:49 | +7 | 65 | |
| 5 |
Liverpool
D
L
D
L
W
W
|
38 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 63:53 | +10 | 60 | |
| 6 |
Bournemouth
D
D
W
W
D
W
|
38 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 58:54 | +4 | 57 | |
| 7 |
Sunderland
W
W
D
D
L
L
|
38 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 42:48 | -6 | 54 | |
| 8 |
Brighton
L
L
W
L
W
D
|
38 | 14 | 11 | 13 | 52:46 | +6 | 53 | |
| 9 |
Brentford
D
D
L
W
L
D
|
38 | 14 | 11 | 13 | 55:52 | +3 | 53 | |
| 10 |
Chelsea
L
W
D
L
L
L
|
38 | 14 | 10 | 14 | 58:52 | +6 | 52 | |
| 11 |
Fulham
W
D
L
L
W
D
|
38 | 15 | 7 | 16 | 47:51 | -4 | 52 | |
| 12 |
Newcastle
L
W
D
W
L
L
|
38 | 14 | 7 | 17 | 53:55 | -2 | 49 | |
| 13 |
Everton
L
L
D
D
L
L
|
38 | 13 | 10 | 15 | 47:50 | -3 | 49 | |
| 14 |
Leeds
L
W
D
W
D
W
|
38 | 11 | 14 | 13 | 49:56 | -7 | 47 | |
| 15 |
Crystal Palace
L
D
L
D
L
L
|
38 | 11 | 12 | 15 | 41:51 | -10 | 45 | |
| 16 |
Nottingham Forest
D
L
D
W
W
W
|
38 | 11 | 11 | 16 | 48:51 | -3 | 44 | |
| 17 |
Tottenham
W
L
D
W
W
D
|
38 | 10 | 11 | 17 | 48:57 | -9 | 41 | |
| 18 |
West Ham
W
L
L
L
W
D
|
38 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 46:65 | -19 | 39 | |
| 19 |
Burnley
D
L
D
L
L
L
|
38 | 4 | 10 | 24 | 38:75 | -37 | 22 | |
| 20 |
Wolves
D
D
L
D
L
L
|
38 | 3 | 11 | 24 | 27:68 | -41 | 20 |