Gooner Zig
AM's Resident Accountant
Country: Canada
125 million last day after all he’ll broke loose. It could never been us risking until last day to see if we sign a striker
Agree, I think we made the right decision.
125 million last day after all he’ll broke loose. It could never been us risking until last day to see if we sign a striker
Well yeah we couldn’t afford him because we haven’t sold anyone. I’m just glad Isak got his move. Would hate for him to be stuck at that clubI think what people meant is could we have signed him after Gyokeres?
Afterall Liverpool spent 90m on Ekitike and still signed Isak for 130m because they can afford to after some brilliant sales
If only we sold better, could have signed 100m plus players like Isak
A big part of selling well is being more ruthless. Moving on well before a player becomes obsolete and loses his appeal, especially if he is earning high wages. We’ve repeatedly missed the boat on this (Martinelli and Zinchenko notably, in the current squad). We did well last summer, moving on from ESR, Nketiah and others but generally speaking we are far too patient and not ruthless enough.
Time to crack open the January thread.
Yes there is that.Focus should also be on the Manager Wish-List Thread.
Agree with this but one thing that needs to be pointed out is that our level has increased dramatically in a very short period of time. The players we are trying to sell were still around when our level was just a top 4 chasing side (e.g., Nelson, Zinchenko). Now that we are an established title challenging + UCL chasing side, teams will want to have a piece of our players that can't quite establish a spot in the first XI with the knowledge that they are still very good.
Additionally, it will help us immensely to win a major trophy. Winning stuff makes every player more valuable. It's a crime that players like Gabriel, Saliba, Saka for example haven't won a big trophy yet - when they do their stature within the game will explode to even higher levels.
Nah they could have made him stay.They could make him stay but they would lose £130M... the money wouldn't be an issue but given EPL is audited / FFP etc is affected...
A big part of selling well is being more ruthless. Moving on well before a player becomes obsolete and loses his appeal, especially if he is earning high wages. We’ve repeatedly missed the boat on this (Martinelli and Zinchenko notably, in the current squad). We did well last summer, moving on from ESR, Nketiah and others but generally speaking we are far too patient and not ruthless enough.
You can only blame the management not selling one of Martinelli or Trossard, but other than that, we had very little sellable assets. Zinchenko on a £150k/w who did not play a whole season is worth nothing. Man utd got stuck with Sancho and Chelsea with Sterling. Chelsea doesn't even know where Mudryk is ...
Now our squad is in the final stage of transformation. Players like Jesus, Martinelli, Trossard, ... who were crucial for us to push a step higher but still lacking the quality to really help us win something will be moved on.
But again why are we sooo much focused on our spending? If it is fine for Kroenke, why do we care?
Years with Wenger, I used the excuse of net spend for our poor performance. Yet nobody is looking back and say, yeah Arsenal finished 4th but had a net spend of -30m ... however people remember Chelsea and Man Utd winning titles (and later Man City) because that is what counts.
We’ve been linked to 70% of that list at one point in time
| Team | P | W | D | L | Goals | GD | Pts | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Arsenal
W
W
W
W
|
4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8:1 | +7 | 12 | |
| 2 |
Manchester City
W
W
W
W
|
4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8:2 | +6 | 12 | |
| 3 |
Leeds
W
D
D
W
|
4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7:3 | +4 | 8 | |
| 4 |
Hull
D
D
W
W
|
4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5:2 | +3 | 8 | |
| 5 |
Brighton
W
D
L
W
|
4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 13:5 | +8 | 7 | |
| 6 |
Chelsea
D
L
W
W
|
4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10:9 | +1 | 7 | |
| 7 |
Brentford
D
D
D
W
|
4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 7:4 | +3 | 6 | |
| 8 |
Liverpool
D
W
D
D
|
4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 6:4 | +2 | 6 | |
| 9 |
Everton
D
D
D
W
|
4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 5:3 | +2 | 6 | |
| 10 |
Ipswich
W
L
L
W
|
4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7:10 | -3 | 6 | |
| 11 |
Nottingham Forest
W
D
D
L
|
4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4:4 | 0 | 5 | |
| 12 |
Newcastle
L
D
W
D
|
4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7:8 | -1 | 5 | |
| 13 |
Manchester United
L
D
W
L
|
4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7:7 | 0 | 4 | |
| 14 |
Sunderland
L
D
W
L
|
4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3:5 | -2 | 4 | |
| 15 |
Bournemouth
D
D
D
L
|
4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6:7 | -1 | 3 | |
| 16 |
Crystal Palace
L
W
L
L
|
4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6:11 | -5 | 3 | |
| 17 |
Tottenham
D
D
L
L
|
4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0:5 | -5 | 2 | |
| 18 |
Fulham
D
L
L
L
|
4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4:7 | -3 | 1 | |
| 19 |
Aston Villa
L
D
L
L
|
4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1:7 | -6 | 1 | |
| 20 |
Coventry
L
L
L
L
|
4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0:10 | -10 | 0 |