Declan Rice: All Hands On Dec

Dokaka

Gunner come out of the closet any day now…
Rice as a prime Casemiro type no6 is still the best role for him (but not the team).

Agree with your post but would add I think this goes beyond just Arsenal. In many ways Rice is a perfect example of how football has shifted in recent years, defending is primarily done much further up the pitch and attacks are started from deep, so you end up somewhat wasting both the defensive star and the playmaking star if you play them in a stereotypical 2015-ish 4-3-3.

It's not every team of course, think it mainly applies to proper good teams expecting to control a lot of game.
 

Trilly

All views posted are NOT my own

Country: England
Only thing I'd change is move him to the right side of the midfield 3, think he could have much more impact bombing towards/into the box without forcing him to either cut inside or shoot/pass with his left foot.

With Saka being so potent cutting in on the right I could easily see Dec be super effective both underlapping and overlapping on the right and getting into good shooting or cutback positions.
This has serious legs, eliminates one of his weaknesses going forwards (the stiffness) and places him in a position where he can utilise his ball striking ability. Also takes some defensive responsbility away from Saka. o_O

Never thought I'd see myself advocating Rice to play in the B2B version of the KDB role but it actually makes sense on paper. :lol:

This is why we need another attacking mid asap, Ødegaard having to play as the RCM is starting to feel a bit restrictive and he isn't exactly showing the form to justify it.
 

outlawz

Southgate's waistcoat knitter
Agree with your post but would add I think this goes beyond just Arsenal. In many ways Rice is a perfect example of how football has shifted in recent years, defending is primarily done much further up the pitch and attacks are started from deep, so you end up somewhat wasting both the defensive star and the playmaking star if you play them in a stereotypical 2015-ish 4-3-3.

It's not every team of course, think it mainly applies to proper good teams expecting to control a lot of game.

Pirlo and Gattuso long set the blueprint of having a creative 6 and a ball winning 8. It's not so much which configuration is better - both are as good as each other (having a defensive 6 and creative 8 instead). The main thing is just ensuring you have the balance in place.
 

Dokaka

Gunner come out of the closet any day now…
Pirlo and Gattuso long set the blueprint of having a creative 6 and a ball winning 8. It's not so much which configuration is better - both are as good as each other (having a defensive 6 and creative 8 instead). The main thing is just ensuring you have the balance in place.

Not the same thing, Milan primarily played a 4 man central midfield and while Pirlo was definitely the deepest midfielder, he had Seedorf and Kaka in front of him. Gattuso was still primarily defending which is reflected in his numbers too, Rice is often so far up the pitch he could be confused as a CF if you took a picture.

It was essentially a different game anyway going so far back so it's very difficult to compare.
 

outlawz

Southgate's waistcoat knitter
Not the same thing, Milan primarily played a 4 man central midfield and while Pirlo was definitely the deepest midfielder, he had Seedorf and Kaka in front of him. Gattuso was still primarily defending which is reflected in his numbers too, Rice is often so far up the pitch he could be confused as a CF if you took a picture.

It was essentially a different game anyway going so far back so it's very difficult to compare.

It is the same in that the playmaker played deeper than than the defensive ball winner who had freedom to hunt higher up the pitch. Rice does play higher up than Gattuso did but that's largely because as a team we play completely differently to older sides who didn't play the field tilt territorial game that we do.
 

Dokaka

Gunner come out of the closet any day now…
It is the same in that the playmaker played deeper than than the defensive ball winner who had freedom to hunt higher up the pitch. Rice does play higher up than Gattuso did but that's largely because as a team we play completely differently to older sides who didn't play the field tilt territorial game that we do.

I disagree with this part mainly because while Pirlo was indeed deeper than Gattuso, there were literally two other playmakers in front of him still. The point about Rice is him literally being the midfielder furthest up the pitch quite often. If you compare him to the mid-2000s Milan sides he's closer to Kaka's role than Gattuso's.

I'd actually argue Pirlo was closer to your example at the latter end of his career when he was playing as the deepest midfielder in the midfield 3 with Vidal and Pogba in front of him. Obviously that was with a back 3 so it's not a 1=1 either but both Vidal and Pogba were definitely more attacking in their positioning than Gattuso was.

Generally agree with the second part but that was also kind of my point.
 
Last edited:

North5

Here since 2009, before Dowman saw the light

Country: England
Yeah I think you're better off trying to get Rice to be more decisive in the final third than become a deep lying playmaker type. He's much further away from that than he is from being a legitimate B2B midfeilder.

Rice as a prime Casemiro type #6 is still the best role for him (but not the team). It's the one role where he ticks every single box and I think he's already the best in the world at it.

Having said that, it's a somewhat limited role and a waste of a player with the engine to effectively play two roles (Chelsea realised the same thing with Kante) so I'm not mad at this B2B experiment. If it fails we can always just put him back at the 6.

He's really growing into the B2B role. And with MLS emerging as the inverted LB we are gaining the defensive shield back we missed with him not being a pure 6. It's working well. He's too good of an athlete to keep in one place most of the match.
 

Riou

The Invincibles, warra team

Country: Northern Ireland
Very poor last night, but no one mentions it...I will though!
 

MutableEarth

Reiss' Dad
Grew as the game went on. Meant to be the 6 but kept getting sucked in high up the pitch. I think this kills the 6 idea even though I still think it should work in theory. But I'm pleased with his performances recently.
 

GoonerJay24

Established Member
Had a good game, especially second half and gave everything. But you could see early on he lacks the quality of Partey and Jorginho
 

Trilly

All views posted are NOT my own

Country: England
Whole thread of people having epiphanies about things I’ve been saying for years and got abuse for.
Btw you kept arguing that Rice couldn’t be a DLP at the 6. Nobody bar a few optimists ever thought he’d be that player.
 

Your Predictions for Premier League: Matchweek 30

BUR BUR - BOU BOU
Upcoming
 14 Mar 2026 14:55
SUN SUN - BHA BHA
Upcoming
 14 Mar 2026 14:55
 14 Mar 2026 17:25
CHE CHE - NEW NEW
Upcoming
 14 Mar 2026 17:25
WHU WHU - MCI MCI
Upcoming
 14 Mar 2026 19:55
MUN MUN - AVL AVL
Upcoming
 15 Mar 2026 13:55
NFO NFO - FUL FUL
Upcoming
 15 Mar 2026 13:55
CRY CRY - LEE LEE
Upcoming
 15 Mar 2026 13:55
LIV LIV - TOT TOT
Upcoming
 15 Mar 2026 16:25
BRE BRE - WOL WOL
Upcoming
 16 Mar 2026 19:55

Arsenal Quotes

I play on the right, Tony on the left and we'll deal with whoever comes along, big or small

Martin Keown

Premier League - Live Table

Team P W D L Goals GD Pts
1
Arsenal
Arsenal
W W W D D W
30 20 7 3 59:22 +37 67
2
Manchester City
Manchester City
D W W W W D
29 18 6 5 59:27 +32 60
3
Manchester United
Manchester United
L W W D W W
29 14 9 6 51:40 +11 51
4
Aston Villa
Aston Villa
L L D W D L
29 15 6 8 39:34 +5 51
5
Chelsea
Chelsea
W L D D W W
29 13 9 7 53:34 +19 48
6
Liverpool
Liverpool
L W W W L W
29 14 6 9 48:39 +9 48
7
Brentford
Brentford
D W L D W W
29 13 5 11 44:40 +4 44
8
Everton
Everton
W W L L W D
29 12 7 10 34:33 +1 43
9
Bournemouth
Bournemouth
D D D W D W
29 9 13 7 44:46 -2 40
10
Fulham
Fulham
L W W L L L
29 12 4 13 40:43 -3 40
11
Sunderland
Sunderland
W D L L L W
29 10 10 9 30:34 -4 40
12
Newcastle
Newcastle
W L L W L L
29 11 6 12 42:43 -1 39
13
Crystal Palace
Crystal Palace
W L W L W D
29 10 8 11 33:35 -2 38
14
Brighton
Brighton
L W W L L D
29 9 10 10 38:36 +2 37
15
Leeds
Leeds
L L D D W L
29 7 10 12 37:48 -11 31
16
Tottenham
Tottenham
L L L L L D
29 7 8 14 39:46 -7 29
17
Nottingham Forest
Nottingham Forest
D L L D L D
29 7 7 15 28:43 -15 28
18
West Ham
West Ham
W L D D W L
29 7 7 15 35:54 -19 28
19
Burnley
Burnley
L L D W L L
29 4 7 18 32:58 -26 19
20
Wolves
Wolves
W W L D D L
30 3 7 20 22:52 -30 16
Top Bottom