I also just don't accept that this even was card-worthy by the letter of the law.Annoys me when all these "by the book" people pop up after something like this. Yes, it was a justifiable sending off by the book, but why is that relevant when this doesn't result in a card 95/100 times, much less a second yellow card?
It's like sending someone off for exaggerating contact which happens literally 20+ times per match. The book says it's a yellow, yet it's never given unless there's daylight between the players.
What about every slight shirt pull on corners, are we going to give out 5+ penalties per game now? The book says so.
By all means enforce the rules, the problem is when referees pick and choose when to do so. Brighton literally did the same thing earlier in the game with zero punishment. I mean players do it every single week with absolutely no penalty.
Should he have done it? No. Is it borderline outrageous he got sent off for it? Yes.
a) The ball was moving and away from the original spot of the foul, you can't argue that a freekick was properly being taken.
b) Rice literally tapped the ball as it was kicked towards him, he didn't initiate the contact himself to begin with and has plausible deniability of knowing whether the ball was in play.
c) When he hits it, he literally ****ing taps it. Not kicking it away, literally nudges it aside. It might be the least egregious attempt at 'wasting time' I've ever seen.
d) The only reason this action even drew much attention is not because time was wasted, but because Rice got his leg kicked the **** out of (likely deliberately) and went down.
I don't even know that he did anything wrong, Veltman made the first 'incorrect' action by moving the ball away from the foul position and attempting to kick it while it was moving. The play should have been considered stopped there.