GDeepā¢
Hustlers University Graduate
I trust your judgement. Do you see a 100 million midfielder or am I just nitpicking with this guy

I trust your judgement. Do you see a 100 million midfielder or am I just nitpicking with this guy
Leave it to Rasmi to list a bunch of things Rice cannot do minutes after he just did it.
There is no comparison between Rice and Partey. Partey can do anything Rice can do, but the inverse is not true.
There is no comparison between Rice and Partey. Partey can do anything Rice can do, but the inverse is not true.
Not sure how anyone believes Rice can play 8. I just think there are some trying to force Rice into our system because he is a good player from England, when we really should be looking at other opportunities. 6 is clearly taken and Rice is not a backup player.
So you are saying Rice is a safe player. So is Elneny. If you want to win matches, you need impact players ( See our starting 11) - players who arenāt afraid to make mistakes to make something happen. Look at Riceās highlight reel and compare to Parteyās. This is not a real discussion. No one would play Rice over Partey in our system because the demands of the position far exceed Riceās capabilities and he would not win matches for us. He is a less appealing option.Partey can't do the defensive aspects of game anywhere as well as Rice ( such as defensive positional awareness, Partey is certainly not best to put it mildly and Rice is great at it, hence the inceptions he makes).
Rice is also the more accurate passer of the two and doesn't give the ball away as reckless and as often as Rice.
Rice also doesn't drop the horror show performances that Partey does ,(although granted Partey has improved and has done then much less than last year).
Staying fit, sure. Better ball winner? If Partey only had such a sole responsibility, and played for a defense minded team, I doubt it.Rice is pretty good at the good old "staying fit" thing. He's also a better ball winner.
He might not win as many matches as us for the things he does on the ball (even though I think he's more than decent enough at them). However, he might win us more matches by making us a bit more defensively solid in certain games.So you are saying Rice is a safe player. So is Elneny. If you want to win matches, you need impact players ( See our starting 11) - players who arenāt afraid to make mistakes to make something happen. Look at Riceās highlight reel and compare to Parteyās. This is not a real discussion. No one would play Rice over Partey in our system because the demands of the position far exceed Riceās capabilities and he would not win matches for us. He is a less appealing option.
So you are saying Rice is a safe player. So is Elneny. If you want to win matches, you need impact players ( See our starting 11) - players who arenāt afraid to make mistakes to make something happen. Look at Riceās highlight reel and compare to Parteyās. This is not a real discussion. No one would play Rice over Partey in our system because the demands of the position far exceed Riceās capabilities and he would not win matches for us. He is a less appealing option.
In our system the #6 has to play a key role in progressing the ball. You can't have a pure destroyer type in there, he needs to take chances to break lines. That's what makes Partey valuable, he's one of the rare players who can both provide defensive coverage over wide spaces and progress the ball to a high level. A Partey that played conservatively wouldn't be as impactful. You're putting undue weight on balls given away without contextualizing it properly.If by safe player, you mean player not known for giving away reckless passes, who can retain possession and has great defensive positional awareness? Then yes, Rice is "safe", as was Gilberto Silva, Gareth Barry, Makelele, Mascherano and Deschamps were "safe".
Partey probaly has a more entertaing highlight video than Gilberto Silva but the reality is from what seen of Partey so far, he's not fit to tie Gilberto's boots.
Lorik Cana has a more entertaining highlight reel than Makelele and I know who I rather of had playing for Arsenal.
It's remind me of Alex Song who also was also reckless and sloppy with his passing. Martin Lawrenson on MOTD would pick out 1 very good pass by the song and praise him as superb player it seemed every match. When in reality Song over dozen times a game, would have head down and make a long passes, hitting and hoping it would somehow find RVP. However, the majority of time Songs passes went to the opposition or was overhit and went out play. Barcelona must of bought song by watching MOTD highlights and never botheres to send a scout to watch a game.
I donāt know who started this Ā£100m stuff, but Ornstein said the price will be āin the Ā£70m rangeā.I trust your judgement. Do you see a 100 million midfielder or am I just nitpicking with this guy
Does anyone consistently look good playing for Southgate. Hard to think that Arteta couldn't get more out of himGood enough for Southgate's boring, pragmatic style, would get exposed in Teta ball.
Interesting, I still think Rice looks better as an 8 than a 6. His offensive capabilities are what excite me. In the first half he went on a driving run and he just glided past people. As a 6 he just looks steady to me, very good at breaking up play but I think he could do that from 8 too, imagine him and Partey counter pressing/defending transitions.There is no comparison between Rice and Partey. Partey can do anything Rice can do, but the inverse is not true.
Not sure how anyone believes Rice can play 8. I just think there are some trying to force Rice into our system because he is a good player from England, when we really should be looking at other opportunities. 6 is clearly taken and Rice is not a backup player.