cannon
Active Member
Country: USA
I’m really hoping he kicks on this season especially if we become more attacking. I’d like to see him on the left wing a little more
11 goals is pretty good for a first season and not really being in the first team the whole time. I wasn't the biggest Eze fan but numbers don't lie.

Does anyone reckon he could do the job as a striker?
See what happens when I try to be positive? I think it just doesn’t suit me at this point.
See what happens when I try to be positive? I think it just doesn’t suit me at this point.
It's so fkin annoying.
Also, some people are slyly using it as a stick to beat Eze with for the whole season, which is incredibly unfair.
He does not have the work ethic to fend of much bigger CBs.Absolutely no chance.
Great diatribe full of nonsense. You wouldn't be saying this if he always runs up and smacks the ball but had the same conversion ratio. You wouldn't be advocating he changes to stutter step or something else.I don't think I can ever forgive him for that penalty.
1. It's not just the fact that it was a stuttered run.
2. It's not just the fact that the goalkeeper went the wrong way early and gave Eze an open net on the opposite side.
3. It's not just the fact that he couldn't even keep it on target despite being an attacker and prioritized precision over a firm hit.
It's the fact that he previously missed numerous penalties using the exact same technique and lazily refused to change it for the biggest game of his life.
His attitude reeks of small club mentality. He's not at Crystal Palace anymore and I don't believe he has fully absorbed that fact in preparation for the biggest moment of his career.
That penalty would look awful even at the local park. He didn't have Gabriel's excuse of being a defender and he came on late so he didn't even have the excuse of tiredness.
If it's full of nonsense, why didn't you address 90% of it?Great diatribe full of nonsense. You wouldn't be saying this if he always runs up and smacks the ball but had the same conversion ratio. You wouldn't be advocating he changes to stutter step or something else.
This narrative in football is just nonsense. Stutter step misses get pulled up all the time but run up and kick it misses get off Scot free
End of the day the ball doesn't go in the net both times
Bro do you ever spend a second on here not talking about Eze? Rent freeThey do lie a bit.
52 games, 5 goals were in two games vs the same team. So 5 goals in 50 games?
Ok he must be creative? Nope, He created a chance every 130 minutes, not even one a game. Someone like Ødegaard for example, creates on every 36 minutes. Eze finished with 6 assists in 54 games.
Ødegaard had 7 in the league alone. Eze had 3. Even Martinelli, with 800 fewer minutes had 5 in the league. Trossard with 6…. Timber even had more.
Sure. I was thinking maybe a false nine role where he'd rely on his technique and flair rather than strength. What Arteta (unsuccessfully) tried with ESR at one point, basically. Obviously, that would require him being surrounded by players with right profiles.He does not have the work ethic to fend of much bigger CBs.
We can say Gyokeres works hard, but you won't see that from Eze.
Yeah I’m laughing at the reply after yours. He’s had a positive first season, some people will just never take to him.See what happens when I try to be positive? I think it just doesn’t suit me at this point.
He’s scored stutter step PKs before. I feel like I’ve seen the tweet that you’ve gotten swept up with where it shows him miss a stutter step previously. Someone replied to it showing the stutter step pens he’s scored.If it's full of nonsense, why didn't you address 90% of it?
1. The goalkeeper went the wrong way early, and he still missed.
2. He couldn't even keep it on target despite prioritizing precision.
3. And worst of all - he missed many times at Crystal Palace using the exact same technique.
Why didn't you address any those points, if you're determined to defend his appalling penalty? I could have mistook you for someone who actually wanted Arsenal to win![]()
Almost gotta give you credit for making it seem bad that he scored five goals in two games against our greatest rivals.They do lie a bit.
52 games, 5 goals were in two games vs the same team. So 5 goals in 50 games?
Ok he must be creative? Nope, He created a chance every 130 minutes, not even one a game. Someone like Ødegaard for example, creates on every 36 minutes. Eze finished with 6 assists in 54 games.
Ødegaard had 7 in the league alone. Eze had 3. Even Martinelli, with 800 fewer minutes had 5 in the league. Trossard with 6…. Timber even had more.
| Team | P | W | D | L | Goals | GD | Pts | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Arsenal
W
W
W
W
W
L
|
38 | 26 | 7 | 5 | 71:27 | +44 | 85 | |
| 2 |
Manchester City
L
D
W
W
D
W
|
38 | 23 | 9 | 6 | 77:35 | +42 | 78 | |
| 3 |
Manchester United
W
W
D
W
W
W
|
38 | 20 | 11 | 7 | 69:50 | +19 | 71 | |
| 4 |
Aston Villa
W
W
D
L
L
W
|
38 | 19 | 8 | 11 | 56:49 | +7 | 65 | |
| 5 |
Liverpool
D
L
D
L
W
W
|
38 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 63:53 | +10 | 60 | |
| 6 |
Bournemouth
D
D
W
W
D
W
|
38 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 58:54 | +4 | 57 | |
| 7 |
Sunderland
W
W
D
D
L
L
|
38 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 42:48 | -6 | 54 | |
| 8 |
Brighton
L
L
W
L
W
D
|
38 | 14 | 11 | 13 | 52:46 | +6 | 53 | |
| 9 |
Brentford
D
D
L
W
L
D
|
38 | 14 | 11 | 13 | 55:52 | +3 | 53 | |
| 10 |
Chelsea
L
W
D
L
L
L
|
38 | 14 | 10 | 14 | 58:52 | +6 | 52 | |
| 11 |
Fulham
W
D
L
L
W
D
|
38 | 15 | 7 | 16 | 47:51 | -4 | 52 | |
| 12 |
Newcastle
L
W
D
W
L
L
|
38 | 14 | 7 | 17 | 53:55 | -2 | 49 | |
| 13 |
Everton
L
L
D
D
L
L
|
38 | 13 | 10 | 15 | 47:50 | -3 | 49 | |
| 14 |
Leeds
L
W
D
W
D
W
|
38 | 11 | 14 | 13 | 49:56 | -7 | 47 | |
| 15 |
Crystal Palace
L
D
L
D
L
L
|
38 | 11 | 12 | 15 | 41:51 | -10 | 45 | |
| 16 |
Nottingham Forest
D
L
D
W
W
W
|
38 | 11 | 11 | 16 | 48:51 | -3 | 44 | |
| 17 |
Tottenham
W
L
D
W
W
D
|
38 | 10 | 11 | 17 | 48:57 | -9 | 41 | |
| 18 |
West Ham
W
L
L
L
W
D
|
38 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 46:65 | -19 | 39 | |
| 19 |
Burnley
D
L
D
L
L
L
|
38 | 4 | 10 | 24 | 38:75 | -37 | 22 | |
| 20 |
Wolves
D
D
L
D
L
L
|
38 | 3 | 11 | 24 | 27:68 | -41 | 20 |