viktor
Tweet Bot
Country: France
eze output in final third better than rogersMy issue is people have taken two games and run with the narrative that Ødegaard holds us back, Eze is the play. Completely ignoring the other games where we struggled to score. Ignoring Chelsea, where vs 10 men, Eze was a ghost. Even vs Sp**s, until his goal, our second btw, (because people seem to think he won that game on his own), he was dreadful. Similar vs Bayern, he was quite, and then came up with the pass, so people forget he did little else. All this is well and good while he adds a G/A to a game, but what happens when he doesn't? He's a passenger, we've got rid of better players than Eze for a lack of workrate.
People take that Villa game, a game at the end of a tough week, a game where we were missing our two CBs, a game where Rice and Zubimendi, our platform to play and dominate games, were visibly exhausted, and are using it as a stick to push the Eze central, Ødegaard bench agenda.
All I'm asking for is lets wait and see, we need a bigger sample scale. If Ødegaard keep nullifying Zubi impact, then yes, change is needed, but that change isn't Eze for me, he's not at the level, this is where my boy Rogers would have worked. The new dream is Yildiz.