Country: England
Mount > ESR , honestly.
That coming from someone who rates ESR.
ESR's battle is more for backup positions with the likes of Curtis Jones and James Maddison / Jesse Lingard / Harvey Elliot, IMO.
Tbf I don't think Liverpool fans will view Curtis Jones or Harvey Elliot too differently than we view ESR, and I don't think they'd be wrong.
Harvey Elliot is a toppppp prospect, knew he had something from the moment be broke the PL age record for Fulham. Went to the championship and produced better numbers than any player we’ve ever sent there too at just 17 years old. Even now he’s only 18 and looked like he was going to force himself into the Liverpool first eleven before his injury. We don’t have much to compare them on but we do have suggests that Elliot is the better prospect atm.Mount is obviously way ahead in his development than ESR, but ability wise there isn’t too much between them. I feel Mount is a better passer and shooter whereas ESR has better dribbling and movement.
ESR is comfortably better than Jones and Elliot, though both are talented players. ESR can also play off both feet which shouldn’t be underestimated when weighing up his potential.
We shouldn’t forget that it was ESR’s introduction to the team last season that reinvigorated us. He’s not a no.10 for me though, he’s your archetypal wide playmaker IMO, he can create and chip in with goals because his movement off the ball is so good.
Jones seems a level lower but I’ve never seen him have a bad game either, I’m not sure if he’s got as much potential as Elliot but any academy player that can contribute for a title challenging PL side is already a success tbh. I think he’s performing at a similar level to ESR but gets less minutes for obvious reasons.