England: Need The Midas Tuch?

Dennis_Bergkamp_10

Established Member

Country: Netherlands

Player:Ødegaard
There's problems with managing the other sex in a changing room I presume, but then again there are men coaching women teams. You'd have to try it to find out whether it works.

A manager has to have knowledge of the game, tactically and psychologically, be good in man management and stuff like that. Don't think that's related to gender.
 

Bloodbather

Established Member

Country: Turkiye
I think women's football shouldn't even be compared to mens football tbh. They should stand apart.

Womens football has improved a lot over the past 10-15 years, fair play. It's a good thing.

What I dislike is the way many want to compare women's football to mens when it paints women's football in a positive light. Such as the women winning the Euros and the men not, as if it's not much, much harder for the mens side.

Then there's the stuff you'd get in a lot of trouble for saying that you wouldn't talking about mens football. For example the level of fitness and conditioning in high end English women's football is poor. You can criticise a guy saying he needs to get in the gym and lose weight, say it about a women's player and you'd get told off.
There's a lot of insincerity going on in mainstream politics and media about issues like this for the sake of political correctness or out of fear that you might offend someone. You get the delusional equality-obsessed freaks that actually believe certain untenable things, but most are just blatantly lying about **** or going along with it.

Then the ground gets left to ****s like Piers Morgan to protest against it. If the sensible people don't speak up, the non-sensible people in the opposite side of the spectrum will, which only adds to their popularity, which makes things even worse.

Tennis is one sport where the prominent male athletes haven't been timid about refuting the terrible "pro-women" arguments. McEnroe took one for the team by saying a mediocre pro male player would beat Serena easily, then Nadal refuted the pay gap thing by pointing to supply and demand.
 

Paperino

It’s Timo Time

Country: Sweden
I cannot in good conscience agree with that. The tactical aspects will largely be the same. It is a bit like saying that the 5000m men's race is different to the 5000m women's race. Would we say that women's tennis is a different sport than men playing tennis?

Individual sports are different.

The difference between mens footbaII and womens footbaII is comparable to the difference between kids footbaII and senior footbaII. The basic stuff is largely the same but the step between a kids team and a senior team is so big that you can talk about different sports.

Bandy and ice hockey have more similarities than mens footbaII and womens footbaII.
 

GoonerJeeves

Established Member

Country: Norway
Individual sports are different.

The difference between mens footbaII and womens footbaII is comparable to the difference between kids footbaII and senior footbaII. The basic stuff is largely the same but the step between a kids team and a senior team is so big that you can talk about different sports.

Bandy and ice hockey have more similarities than mens footbaII and womens footbaII.
The question here was whether it was a "different sport". I don't agree with that. We wouldn't call men's handball or women's handball a different sport. If we are to stick to team sports, we wouldn't call a cross country relay a different sport if it was done by women or men, nor a 4x100 men relay sprint a different sport from a 4x100 women relay.

I think the crux of the matter here is that women's football is a much less mature part of football than for instance women handball, volleyball or the various relays in endurance sports. That lies more within football itself.
 

Mohamed7

Well-Known Member
Why would an English coach getting the job be nepotism?

English coaches for English jobs mate.
Your post is exactly what is nepotism.

I don’t even understand what significant benefit it brings considering there are a lot of better and experienced foreign coaches.

It is the same backword thinking Premier League clubs had before Arsène was selected. Now all the top clubs have non-British managers.
 

Mohamed7

Well-Known Member
Women are fully capable of coaching in men's football; there are no inherent limitations due to gender.

However, I believe it's problematic to use achievements in women’s football as the sole qualification for coaching roles in men's football. Winning championships like the Euros might not fully translate to the men’s game, where the sport benefits from more developed infrastructures and longer histories of player development.

Countries like the USA and England, which actively invest in women's sports, do have a significant advantage. This can sometimes skew perceptions of coaching success due to the varying levels of competition and development in women's football globally.
 

HattoriHanzo

Well-Known Member

Country: Croatia
Think Potter and Howe would be alright actually. The England job is literally the only top job a British manager or coach can realistically hope to get without taking a club from A to B by themselves.

Guys who got top jobs quickly like Arteta or Pirlo are better examples of Nepotism.
Did Arteta and Pirlo applied for a job and other candidates had better CV?
And Arteta and Pirlo got the job because they had connections in Arsenal/ Juventus and other candidates (with better CV) didn't?

This would be nepotism.

Was this the case with Arteta and Pirlo?
 

Bloodbather

Established Member

Country: Turkiye
Well, if a bunch of non-british managers apply and a lesser coach gets the job due to being british then that is an advantage/privilege that would be deemed nepotism.

The nuance here being the apply bit, which doesn't tend to happen with a job as big as this as candidates are most likely approached.
Not really nepotism. It's the national team, being from the country is a clear advantage.

National teams are rarely coached by foreigners. It's usually mid-tier teams who don't have their **** together domestically that rely on some foreign coach to "teach them the way".
 

Macho

Mr Delete

Country: England
Not really nepotism. It's the national team, being from the country is a clear advantage.

National teams are rarely coached by foreigners. It's usually mid-tier teams who don't have their **** together domestically that rely on some foreign coach to "teach them the way".

Then explain Roberto Martinez who’s coached Belgium and Portugal then?

Yeah I’m just not into the nationalism aspect of international football at all. Think it’s out dated so I’m actually not fussed one bit who the hell manages England as they still won’t win sh*t anyways.

Club football is superior because the best person normally gets the job which is how sports should be.
 

Blood on the Tracks

Michael Owen Level Analysis

Country: England

Player:Rice
Generally I'd prefer an English manager but if you have the choice of Klopp / Pep or Potter / Howe you have to go for the former.

England are in quite a good position, they'll go into the World Cup as one of the favourites so maybe they can attract a real top tier coach, even if it's just for a couple of years.
 

Blood on the Tracks

Michael Owen Level Analysis

Country: England

Player:Rice
Hi @Blood on the Tracks
I've seen you responded to the women's football bit but was wondering if you had the chance to review the above point as well?
Thanks,
jones

Because it's not apples to apples.

Black men play mens football and I don't know the percentages in England but I imagine they're fairly well represented as players. So black guys being in the men's football system from boyhood there's no good reason why they should be so poorly represented in mens management and I can only logically put it down to their being some systemic issues there that are acting as blockers or putting black guys off from wanting to go into management.

Womens managers exist in a totally different ecosystem so it doesn't seem odd to me at all that they're not represented in mens football, I can't think of a good reason why they would be tbh.
 

Macho

Mr Delete

Country: England
Seeing as a lot of modern football can be boiled down to data and patterns, women could 100% absolutely coach a mens team.

We all suspect these players aren't going to listen to a woman though, so it's less about what the woman is capable of doing and more about the players willingness to be coached by the opposite sex.
 

Arsenal Quotes

A player's true character is in how he plays and not in his social life. You can hide your real personality in your social life, You cannot on the field.

Arsène Wenger

Latest posts

Top Bottom