Macho
Mr Delete
Country: England
Man like Ian Ladyman lmao
This is why I can’t do the England ting fully.
Guilty as chargedAnyway this is all @A_G stirring the pot, trying to get me in trouble with his woke mafia.
Troubling!
There's a lot of insincerity going on in mainstream politics and media about issues like this for the sake of political correctness or out of fear that you might offend someone. You get the delusional equality-obsessed freaks that actually believe certain untenable things, but most are just blatantly lying about **** or going along with it.I think women's football shouldn't even be compared to mens football tbh. They should stand apart.
Womens football has improved a lot over the past 10-15 years, fair play. It's a good thing.
What I dislike is the way many want to compare women's football to mens when it paints women's football in a positive light. Such as the women winning the Euros and the men not, as if it's not much, much harder for the mens side.
Then there's the stuff you'd get in a lot of trouble for saying that you wouldn't talking about mens football. For example the level of fitness and conditioning in high end English women's football is poor. You can criticise a guy saying he needs to get in the gym and lose weight, say it about a women's player and you'd get told off.
I cannot in good conscience agree with that. The tactical aspects will largely be the same. It is a bit like saying that the 5000m men's race is different to the 5000m women's race. Would we say that women's tennis is a different sport than men playing tennis?
The question here was whether it was a "different sport". I don't agree with that. We wouldn't call men's handball or women's handball a different sport. If we are to stick to team sports, we wouldn't call a cross country relay a different sport if it was done by women or men, nor a 4x100 men relay sprint a different sport from a 4x100 women relay.Individual sports are different.
The difference between mens footbaII and womens footbaII is comparable to the difference between kids footbaII and senior footbaII. The basic stuff is largely the same but the step between a kids team and a senior team is so big that you can talk about different sports.
Bandy and ice hockey have more similarities than mens footbaII and womens footbaII.
Why would an English coach getting the job be nepotism?
Your post is exactly what is nepotism.English coaches for English jobs mate.
Did Arteta and Pirlo applied for a job and other candidates had better CV?Think Potter and Howe would be alright actually. The England job is literally the only top job a British manager or coach can realistically hope to get without taking a club from A to B by themselves.
Guys who got top jobs quickly like Arteta or Pirlo are better examples of Nepotism.
Not really nepotism. It's the national team, being from the country is a clear advantage.Well, if a bunch of non-british managers apply and a lesser coach gets the job due to being british then that is an advantage/privilege that would be deemed nepotism.
The nuance here being the apply bit, which doesn't tend to happen with a job as big as this as candidates are most likely approached.
Not really nepotism. It's the national team, being from the country is a clear advantage.
National teams are rarely coached by foreigners. It's usually mid-tier teams who don't have their **** together domestically that rely on some foreign coach to "teach them the way".
Hi @Blood on the TracksBecause absolutely no one is willing to give them a chance? There's barely any black coaches either despite a big percentage of the players being black.
Hi @Blood on the Tracks
I've seen you responded to the women's football bit but was wondering if you had the chance to review the above point as well?
Thanks,
jones