Country: England
I agree tbh. The man's a product of his environment so saying he doesn't deserve an opinion because of how he speaks is discrimination.
BludFam was touched personally here
I agree tbh. The man's a product of his environment so saying he doesn't deserve an opinion because of how he speaks is discrimination.
BludFam was touched personally here
And a clear intentional elbow by Huddlestone on the back of Walcott's head does not draw any debate. The ref deemed it intentional hence the yellow, elbows are red card offence, you'd think even moreso after Mason injury and latest FA directives. I'm not saying it should have been, just pointing out the biased hypocrisy.Last week an 'unintentional' elbow on Bellerin is supposedly acceptable. Goal not questioned, Bellerin should have been stronger.
This week a clear unintentional handball is deemed acceptable by the ref (and the laws of the game). Yet pundits still want to question it.
Best Wenger defence I've ever read, on here or anywhere else.Fair enough, but nobody's perfect. Better to value what they do rather than want more--bearing in mind you can readily acknowledge that we're where were are because of him.
I agree tbh. The man's a product of his environment so saying he doesn't deserve an opinion because of how he speaks is discrimination.
I agree tbh. The man's a product of his environment so saying he doesn't deserve an opinion because of how he speaks is discrimination.
To be fair, the 'laws of the game' mean nothing in relation to handballs. There are always unintentional handballs penalised, I'd say 9 out of 10 handballs are unintentional. The goal shouldn't have stood but it wasn't an easy call, I didn't notice it until I watched the close up replay. The linesman needed to be in a good position to see it but I'm assuming he wasn't.Last week an 'unintentional' elbow on Bellerin is supposedly acceptable. Goal not questioned, Bellerin should have been stronger.
This week a clear unintentional handball is deemed acceptable by the ref (and the laws of the game). Yet pundits still want to question it.
Not himself but rather he takes the club seriously. He must if he's trekking all over the country week in and week out, giving up weekends and week nights supporting the team. His passion is utterly justified.I don't mind how he talks but takes himself too seriously .
Not himself but rather he takes the club seriously. He must if he's trekking all over the country week in and week out, giving up weekends and week nights supporting the team. His passion is utterly justified.
Just a shame I'm talking about the productivity of Alexis!Best Wenger defence I've ever read, on here or anywhere else.
Yeah it's great so do thousands of others , but he also loves the camera .
Thousands go to away games, but hardly thousands attend all the away games. Quite few in fact. And loving the camera, or to voice one's opinion was never a crime, thousands have made careers and millions out of it, so why is it suddenly a slight on his character?
After all, we're all here voicing our opinions about the same club in a forum started solely for that reason. Youtube is a mere extension of that.
I don't know the man, never will, but why is it that we find it so easy to sit here behind our keyboards and undermine the character and motives of a man who does nothing more than support the club and voice an occasional opinion, when no one is forcing our hands to click the play button?
I'm not being serious Rimaal hence the laughing emoticon.
I know. I just needed to get it off my chest, really.
Always good with you as far as I'm concerned, celestis.Yeah dawned on me it might be one of those times , all good
It's not even the way he speaks, just the fact that he's a miserable **** who moans win, lose or draw. People would respect Troopz if he was more positive, like this don who used to come on AFTV in its 1st season:I hear that but it's important to learn how to articulate. You can't be on camera talking about "blud, blud, fam, fam yeah, ya understand."
We had to learn, so should he!
That was good, bravo.Best Wenger defence I've ever read, on here or anywhere else.
Yeah I've never really gotten the hate that the Arsenal fan tv guys get. I don't see any difference between what they say on there and the posts that I read on here. In fact I'm sure that each opinion represented on AFTV has a post mirroring it on forums such as this one.Thousands go to away games, but hardly thousands attend all the away games. Quite few in fact. And loving the camera, or to voice one's opinion was never a crime, thousands have made careers and millions out of it, so why is it suddenly a slight on his character?
After all, we're all here voicing our opinions about the same club in a forum started solely for that reason. Youtube is a mere extension of that.
I don't know the man, never will, but why is it that we find it so easy to sit here behind our keyboards and undermine the character and motives of a man who does nothing more than support the club and voice an occasional opinion, when no one is forcing our hands to click the play button?
It's not even the way he speaks, just the fact that he's a miserable **** who moans win, lose or draw. People would respect Troopz if he was more positive, like this don who used to come on AFTV in its 1st season:
Grosicki did well for them, but was substituted earlyish second half, gave Bellerin a run for his money in the pace department.Couldn't see the game as I was travelling. How was Grosicki for Hull?