Arnie
Well-Known Member
I haven't really seen Hoyte so i need to ask what his qualities are, is he better than Senderos?? Is he the real deal??
theguvnor said:Hoyte is mustard, ive watched him for years at reserve level regularly and he has always impressed, he has now come up to play in arsenal friendlys and has excelled in these. I havent seen much of senderos as i only got to about 12 youth matches last year, and he has been injured for a while, but i do know hoyte is the real deal.
He is like thuram in can play centre back and right back, but his dominant position is right back. Looks like wenger wants to test him at centre back as he did for kolo, might be smart as if we sign trabelsi it means he will be 3rd in line for one position, but if he moves to centre back (which he is doing well at) then he may overtake senderos and cygan and be first choice sub.
He is lightning fast and a great tackler, very determined and impossible to get past. He should definately be in the first team set up, if he can develop to be a good centre back then that will be good as we can then use him like a thuram - in either position.
Arnie said:I haven't really seen Hoyte so i need to ask what his qualities are, is he better than Senderos?? Is he the real deal??
kel varnsen said:Arnie said:I haven't really seen Hoyte so i need to ask what his qualities are, is he better than Senderos?? Is he the real deal??
hoyte is not a very good right back. too sloppy passning game and he's not comfortable with the ball. not an arsenal type of full back; maybe he'd do better at leicester or west bromwhich...
fahti on the other hand...
Nah im speaking the truth, i am excited by him, i am sure that he can be just like ashley cole, he is a very consistent performer. Even wenger said "i have never seen anyone go past him".just if you're true and don't magnify
Do you even know what you are talking about? How many times have you seen him play? Also how can you say fahti is better prospect when he has played all of 2 games :|hoyte is not a very good right back. too sloppy passning game and he's not comfortable with the ball. not an arsenal type of full back; maybe he'd do better at leicester or west bromwhich...
fahti on the other hand...
kel varnsen said:Arnie said:I haven't really seen Hoyte so i need to ask what his qualities are, is he better than Senderos?? Is he the real deal??
hoyte is not a very good right back. too sloppy passning game and he's not comfortable with the ball. not an arsenal type of full back; maybe he'd do better at leicester or west bromwhich...
fahti on the other hand...
kel varnsen said:Arnie said:I haven't really seen Hoyte so i need to ask what his qualities are, is he better than Senderos?? Is he the real deal??
hoyte is not a very good right back. too sloppy passning game and he's not comfortable with the ball. not an arsenal type of full back; maybe he'd do better at leicester or west bromwhich...
fahti on the other hand...
calvinngai88 said:kel varnsen said:Arnie said:I haven't really seen Hoyte so i need to ask what his qualities are, is he better than Senderos?? Is he the real deal??
hoyte is not a very good right back. too sloppy passning game and he's not comfortable with the ball. not an arsenal type of full back; maybe he'd do better at leicester or west bromwhich...
fahti on the other hand...
Total rubbish! I wonder who will agree to your statement about Hoyte. I doubt you seen him playing for the reserves, in Carling Cup matches last season and also the pre-season friendlies.
His tackles are strong, and for once, a striker evaded him, but within 0.5sec, Hoyte is back in front of him and cleared the ball away. He's not going to be the new Thuram, he'll be the new Kolo, but an english one. I'm sure he'll break into the England squad very soon.