grange
Edu Defence League 🫡
Country: USA
Player:Calafiori
It's beyond disgusting what Berta has done to this club
Not if MLS gets moved to DM or CMEnough noise now, may as well discuss it. Another LB is mad.
Mikel nearly got another CB and LB before attack![]()
Not if MLS gets moved to DM or CM
Can’t imagine he will, if he is to be considered a starter.
Could similar to what we paid for timber around 40M€MLS backup. I don’t mind as long as it’s under 50 million
That’s nothing tbh. That price for a good backup in an area we are shortCould similar to what we paid for timber around 40M€
It will beMLS backup. I don’t mind as long as it’s under 50 million
MLS backup. I don’t mind as long as it’s under 50 million
This is what Assna under Mikel is, we had two left backs in Cala and MLS and wasted 50m on Hato.
White and Timber can comfortably cover RCBAt first glance, signing Hato doesn't make much sense even if he is immensely talented, but I think it could make a lot of sense if Arteta thinks either Hato and/or Calafiori can play RCB. Also, if this is the case, I think we might be able to adjust our tactics in defense, when needed.
This season when Saliba got suspended Kiwior had to play RCB and he didn't look good in that position. Normally, left-footed players struggle at RCB, so I wasn't surprised by Kiwior's struggles, but Hato and Calafiori are much more versatile and better on the ball than Kiwior.
RCB is the position where we need more depth, so I hope Arteta thinks Hato or Calafiori can play there. Plenty of right-footed defenders play LCB, so it isn't farfetched that a left-footed CB could play RCB.
Next season our defensive depth will probably be: RB; Timber, White - RCB; Saliba - LCB; Gabriel (Kiwior, he may leave) Calafiori - LB; MLS, Hato. I'm not expecting anything from Tomiyasu. Regardless of whether Kiwior leaves or stays, we need someone who can play RCB, so I hope the plan is for Calafiori or Hato to play there when needed.
Lastly, both Calafiori and Hato are very good on the ball, and can invert into midfield from LB. So if they end up playing CB for us, either RCB or LCB, they can also invert into midfield from CB. Two seasons ago, Guardiola used Stones like this and it was very effective. Not saying that we should do this every match, but it would be a good option to have.
I think this could be a good signing if Arteta plans on him, or Calafiori, being an option at RCB.
I believe you need at least 3 LBs minimum. Maybe I’m being greedy but I would go for Hato and another LBRasmi in 2 months:
White and Timber can definitely play there, but they're also our only RBs and Timber is coming back from an injury. If one of them gets hurt, then we don't have a backup RB or RCB, and that would be a problem.White and Timber can comfortably cover RCB
I think he might already be our best press resistant midfielder. Come at me guys
White and Timber can comfortably cover RCB
| Team | P | W | D | L | Goals | GD | Pts | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Arsenal
W
W
W
D
D
W
|
30 | 20 | 7 | 3 | 59:22 | +37 | 67 | |
| 2 |
Manchester City
D
W
W
W
W
D
|
29 | 18 | 6 | 5 | 59:27 | +32 | 60 | |
| 3 |
Manchester United
L
W
W
D
W
W
|
29 | 14 | 9 | 6 | 51:40 | +11 | 51 | |
| 4 |
Aston Villa
L
L
D
W
D
L
|
29 | 15 | 6 | 8 | 39:34 | +5 | 51 | |
| 5 |
Chelsea
W
L
D
D
W
W
|
29 | 13 | 9 | 7 | 53:34 | +19 | 48 | |
| 6 |
Liverpool
L
W
W
W
L
W
|
29 | 14 | 6 | 9 | 48:39 | +9 | 48 | |
| 7 |
Brentford
D
W
L
D
W
W
|
29 | 13 | 5 | 11 | 44:40 | +4 | 44 | |
| 8 |
Everton
W
W
L
L
W
D
|
29 | 12 | 7 | 10 | 34:33 | +1 | 43 | |
| 9 |
Bournemouth
D
D
D
W
D
W
|
29 | 9 | 13 | 7 | 44:46 | -2 | 40 | |
| 10 |
Fulham
L
W
W
L
L
L
|
29 | 12 | 4 | 13 | 40:43 | -3 | 40 | |
| 11 |
Sunderland
W
D
L
L
L
W
|
29 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 30:34 | -4 | 40 | |
| 12 |
Newcastle
W
L
L
W
L
L
|
29 | 11 | 6 | 12 | 42:43 | -1 | 39 | |
| 13 |
Crystal Palace
W
L
W
L
W
D
|
29 | 10 | 8 | 11 | 33:35 | -2 | 38 | |
| 14 |
Brighton
L
W
W
L
L
D
|
29 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 38:36 | +2 | 37 | |
| 15 |
Leeds
L
L
D
D
W
L
|
29 | 7 | 10 | 12 | 37:48 | -11 | 31 | |
| 16 |
Tottenham
L
L
L
L
L
D
|
29 | 7 | 8 | 14 | 39:46 | -7 | 29 | |
| 17 |
Nottingham Forest
D
L
L
D
L
D
|
29 | 7 | 7 | 15 | 28:43 | -15 | 28 | |
| 18 |
West Ham
W
L
D
D
W
L
|
29 | 7 | 7 | 15 | 35:54 | -19 | 28 | |
| 19 |
Burnley
L
L
D
W
L
L
|
29 | 4 | 7 | 18 | 32:58 | -26 | 19 | |
| 20 |
Wolves
W
W
L
D
D
L
|
30 | 3 | 7 | 20 | 22:52 | -30 | 16 |