Country: Norway
Could you play a right back as an inverted left back. Logically that would make sense. Retrain Norton-Cuffy for this?
Don't necessarily need another inverted left-back, a more traditional overlapping fullback could also be very useful for some games.
Those sort of arguments work both ways though. The player (Zinchenko) we replaced him with cost £30m so they could argue £50m for the ****ter backup is a piss-take.
Don't necessarily need another inverted left-back, a more traditional overlapping fullback could also be very useful for some games.
Yeah, the Tomi stuff is weird to me. No way is he a better traditional LB than KT.
I’m not sure it’s even worked all that well. You can make a case for it working at Liverpool (although given how rubbish they’ve been it makes it a bit less of an achievement) but against for example Southampton, I thought we missed the attack down the left and the control in midfield. It might have helped get full points.
See Liverppol against Arsenal. Tomi locked Salah up.Yeah, the Tomi stuff is weird to me. No way is he a better traditional LB than KT.
See Liverppol against Arsenal. Tomi locked Salah up.
On less wages and with potential.So... Kieran Tierney?
On less wages and with potential.
Any fullback that's comfortable playing possession football should be able to play the inverted FB role to some success, ZInchenko just takes it to the next level by actually being a midfielder.
KT on the other hand just panics too much in possession and doesn't have the composure to play the role.