field442
Hates Journalists Named James
If a reasonable offer comes in you sell him. That's what a club who wants to operate properly in the transfer market should do.
He is not consistent enough. We need a back up to spark the offense which he often does not do. Most often I don't notice any different when Martinelli sucked and gets subbed by Trossard. We need a Madueke kind of player as back up on LW.We should keep trossard he has been clutch for us scoring 19 goals and assist is top contribution.I would sell Martenelli and buy a top LW.Cant let both of them go together.
Doubt he moves anywhere other than where his kids are going to be and his ex-wife isn't going to move to follow the tail end of his career.
If he leaves he'll be staying in the UK if they're settled there or moving to somewhere near Belgium and so the bundesliga
He is not consistent enough. We need a back up to spark the offense which he often does not do. Most often I don't notice any different when Martinelli sucked and gets subbed by Trossard. We need a Madueke kind of player as back up on LW.
19 G/A is not bad at all.We should keep trossard he has been clutch for us scoring 19 goals and assist is top contribution.I would sell Martenelli and buy a top LW.Cant let both of them go together.
Nelli should have been gone last season with Trossard leaving this summer in an ideal world.rather keep him than Martinelli, I'll be honest.
Nelli should have been gone last season with Trossard leaving this summer in an ideal world.
I believe a full clear out isn’t OTT, we’re making up for years of neglect and sorting the position for the next cycle.
That’s two LWs in my book. I don’t mind.Hard to see us getting two LWs. At most I see one "specialist" and a guy like Rodgers who can play across.
That would work.Hard to see us getting two LWs. At most I see one "specialist" and a guy like Rodgers who can play across.
If we sign Rogers then there would be an argument he is there to play multiple positions...a new out and out winger would see they have competition but may see an opportunity to establish themselves in the first team.I would keep one to ease the transition. No need to try and replace both because what is likely to then happen is we sign a starting player and sign a dead backup - just like we did at DM when we replaced Partey and Jorginho with Zubimendi and Nørgaard.
At least, if you keep one - we have a good backup. We aren't going to spend 80 odd mill on a starter and then another 80 odd mill on a young high talent backup. That's not realistic at all.
Keep one of Martinelli or Trossard. Given their ages, I would keep Martinelli, even though I prefer Trossard as a player.
To be fair, last summer the club leaked they kept Nelli to rehab his image to then sell this summer. Although his PL performances weren't great, I think his CL goals can be co sidered a success with regards to improving his sellabilityNelli should have been gone last season with Trossard leaving this summer in an ideal world.
I believe a full clear out isn’t OTT, we’re making up for years of neglect and sorting the position for the next cycle.
Probably did good for his image in Europe but damaged his rep further in the PLTo be fair, last summer the club leaked they kept Nelli to rehab his image to then sell this summer. Although his PL performances weren't great, I think his CL goals can be co sidered a success with regards to improving his sellability
| Team | P | W | D | L | Goals | GD | Pts | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Arsenal
W
W
W
W
W
L
|
38 | 26 | 7 | 5 | 71:27 | +44 | 85 | |
| 2 |
Manchester City
L
D
W
W
D
W
|
38 | 23 | 9 | 6 | 77:35 | +42 | 78 | |
| 3 |
Manchester United
W
W
D
W
W
W
|
38 | 20 | 11 | 7 | 69:50 | +19 | 71 | |
| 4 |
Aston Villa
W
W
D
L
L
W
|
38 | 19 | 8 | 11 | 56:49 | +7 | 65 | |
| 5 |
Liverpool
D
L
D
L
W
W
|
38 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 63:53 | +10 | 60 | |
| 6 |
Bournemouth
D
D
W
W
D
W
|
38 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 58:54 | +4 | 57 | |
| 7 |
Sunderland
W
W
D
D
L
L
|
38 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 42:48 | -6 | 54 | |
| 8 |
Brighton
L
L
W
L
W
D
|
38 | 14 | 11 | 13 | 52:46 | +6 | 53 | |
| 9 |
Brentford
D
D
L
W
L
D
|
38 | 14 | 11 | 13 | 55:52 | +3 | 53 | |
| 10 |
Chelsea
L
W
D
L
L
L
|
38 | 14 | 10 | 14 | 58:52 | +6 | 52 | |
| 11 |
Fulham
W
D
L
L
W
D
|
38 | 15 | 7 | 16 | 47:51 | -4 | 52 | |
| 12 |
Newcastle
L
W
D
W
L
L
|
38 | 14 | 7 | 17 | 53:55 | -2 | 49 | |
| 13 |
Everton
L
L
D
D
L
L
|
38 | 13 | 10 | 15 | 47:50 | -3 | 49 | |
| 14 |
Leeds
L
W
D
W
D
W
|
38 | 11 | 14 | 13 | 49:56 | -7 | 47 | |
| 15 |
Crystal Palace
L
D
L
D
L
L
|
38 | 11 | 12 | 15 | 41:51 | -10 | 45 | |
| 16 |
Nottingham Forest
D
L
D
W
W
W
|
38 | 11 | 11 | 16 | 48:51 | -3 | 44 | |
| 17 |
Tottenham
W
L
D
W
W
D
|
38 | 10 | 11 | 17 | 48:57 | -9 | 41 | |
| 18 |
West Ham
W
L
L
L
W
D
|
38 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 46:65 | -19 | 39 | |
| 19 |
Burnley
D
L
D
L
L
L
|
38 | 4 | 10 | 24 | 38:75 | -37 | 22 | |
| 20 |
Wolves
D
D
L
D
L
L
|
38 | 3 | 11 | 24 | 27:68 | -41 | 20 |