Dregen57
Active Member
Of course he has. But it will not last. I hope
One of the most over rated players of this era.worst thing for him is that he's not even a loss for them...
This sort of revival happens often actually. Clearly the players had downed tools under Mourinho. He creates a hostile enviroment. Look at their squad. Do you honestly believe they are the 6th best team in the league as they were sitting before Oleh???? Come off it mate. They're a good side. A half decent manager could get them into the top four.I don't know to what extent it's happening, but you can't honestly believe that Solksjaer's produced this turnaround on his own?
This sort of revival happens often actually. Clearly the players had downed tools under Mourinho. He creates a hostile enviroment. Look at their squad. Do you honestly believe they are the 6th best team in the league as they were sitting before Oleh???? Come off it mate. They're a good side. A half decent manager could get them into the top four.
I read a brilliant article written after Mou's last Chelsea stint which stated that he creates this siege mentality within the club. Everything is against them; The refs, the decisions, the weather, the everything. For the first season it sort of works as the fight or flight mentality is instilled and most players (being in a competitive atmosphere for their whole lives) thrive for a bit and take the challenge head on. But after a couple of seasons it becomes draining. Players feel victimised and, just as any nation, people or anything under constant siege, begin to revolt against the 'oppressor'. Who they eventually see as Mou himself. His own tactic is his biggest downfall.Agree. You can also see that they're basically just playing basic football to their average ability again - there's no intricate tactics or whatever going on. Don't think you need Fergie for that. Right now it's not so much about who their manager is, but just that miserable Mou isn't anymore. The shackles have come off, there's a good atmosphere again and they have a good squad that can cope without a tactical genius for a run in.
Look I'm not saying you are wrong but it is quite peculiar that so many before him HAVE failed to get the best out of this HUGELY expensive squad.I was as skeptical as most other posters on here about Solskjær earlier on, but now I'm not sure he's going to bottle it in the long run, I think it's easy to write him off -I'm not so sure we should anymore.
He's not tactically inept or just a cheerleader like some people imagine him to be, I've seen him manage domestically, he's mini-Fergie in some ways, he's clever, but I didn't believe he'd do so well with Man Utd.
If he's still managing them next season and Man Utd. make some good signings in the summer, I think they're going to be right up there top three, maybe challenging for the title although I wouldn't bet on them to win it.
I don't think there should be a discussion on his potential greatness as of yet, Solskjær hasn't done anything to earn to be called great, it's typical of the football scene to exaggerate.Look I'm not saying you are wrong but it is quite peculiar that so many before him HAVE failed to get the best out of this HUGELY expensive squad.
Any manager would lick their lips taking on this job yet Moyes, LVG and Mou all stuffed it up quite spectacularly. To the point that now everybody is debating how great Ole is...
As I said, he may very well be great, but the absolute failure before him has left some low expectations and we're seeing him reap the reward for that...
Also, Mou did win things for them so they've basically just not re-evaluated their expectations during the transition.
Interested to hear your reasoning behind this. Not suggesting you are wrong, just curious.none of them were like Fergie and he is, and maybe that's exactly what they need from a manager.
Similar sort of thing with Arsenal when Wenger was leaving, everybody emphasized that it was important that the "soul" that Wenger had created for the club was kept alive (attacking football and all that) and that if it weren't things wouldn't work out well for us, and I think for once everybody was right about that, because it's not just how the club plays really, it's what the club is in a way and one thing that every Man Utd. fan I've seen say after Solskjær took over is that the club's identity is back, I don't think we can over-emphasize how much that matters to clubs like ours where we have decades of a specific type of culture at the clubs.Interested to hear your reasoning behind this. Not suggesting you are wrong, just curious.
Good point. I have in recent times negated this theory but you've explained it in such a way that I think I agree. Also, we looked better in the last two fixtures with more of a plan. Even though we allowed Sp**s to have the ball we were in the mindset to attack when given the chance. Hence Rambo's goal.Similar sort of thing with Arsenal when Wenger was leaving, everybody emphasized that it was important that the "soul" that Wenger had created for the club was kept alive (attacking football and all that) and that if it weren't things wouldn't work out well for us, and I think for once everybody was right about that, because it's not just how the club plays really, it's what the club is in a way and one thing that every Man Utd. fan I've seen say after Solskjær took over is that the club's identity is back, I don't think we can over-emphasize how much that matters to clubs like ours where we have decades of a specific type of culture at the clubs.
I don't know to what extent it's happening, but you can't honestly believe that Solksjaer's produced this turnaround on his own?
One of the most over rated players of this era.
Moyes, LVG and Mou all stuffed it up quite spectacularly
Agree. I believe he could have become an all time great or cult player in football, but he chose to become an egotistical **** (and overloaded his body).
I agree, he did a RVP, jumped ship at the expense of becoming a legend. He's just one more example of grass not always greener!