dino bravo
Established Member
Country: England
Interested to hear your expert opinionFan fiction
Interested to hear your expert opinionFan fiction
Interested to hear your expert opinion
Does it matter? Cheating **** will get away with it anyway. Don't get invested in this trial because you will get dissappointed in the end.When is the trial going to start on their 115 charges?
I hope for the worst for City but what happened to the fit and proper test that delayed Cellino buying Leeds? City, Newcastle and Chelsea owners say hi. None of them are exactly "comforting".Interesting from a legal expert on X:
View attachment 27961
View attachment 27960View attachment 27959
You could get them to sign contracts that prohibits them refeering in other leagues i.e. my work contract prohibits me from working for others in the field i am employed. They probably dont because they dont pay large sums of money to referees relative to the finances/impact of the leagueI don’t think it’s that simple. I don’t know if the PL have the power to prevent refs from going overseas when they have free time even if they wanted to. Would be a bit like if you told your whore you wanted to be exclusive. It’s just not in the contract.
And yes, the use of whore to refer to referees was very very deliberate.
We should raid them like Inter raided Juve in 06 and win the next 5 titles. I would take Haaland, Lewis, Savinho and maybe Grealish.Can’t wait for Foden to join us and @Trilly be confronted with having to turn against him
We should raid them like Inter raided Juve in 06 and win the next 5 titles. I would take Haaland, Lewis, Savinho and maybe Grealish.
Don't know, he'd be handy off the bench...No **** Haaland. Don't want him anywhere near our team, despite his goal record.
Ultimately what happens with City will be all down to what the EPL can prove - crucial will be whether the measuring stick is 'beyond reasonable doubt' or 'on the balance of probabilities' - I'm not sure which it is in this case. If its the former, it'll be a fudge and minor charges proved with a few points deducted and fines. If the latter, City are screwed unless they can somehow get all the hacked and leaked evidence struck out.
if the evidence stands and its 'balance of probabilities', they can't stay in the EPL without a point deduction that guarantees relegation, because the evidence is hugely damaging but not totally conclusive by itself.
That's a standard clause in most employer contracts, let alone for public figures like PL refs they absolutely could forbid them from doing it. Why would they though when the whole point of becoming a member of the PGMOB is to end up in someone's pocket.I don’t think it’s that simple. I don’t know if the PL have the power to prevent refs from going overseas when they have free time even if they wanted to. Would be a bit like if you told your whore you wanted to be exclusive. It’s just not in the contract.
I don't know what this means, but I have no idea why people think anything will happen to these corrupt barstewardsApparently City have come out on top in the associated transactions arbitration….the precursor to the 115 arbitration….fecks sake….
I don't know what this means, but I have no idea why people think anything will happen to these corrupt barstewards
I was at talking to a guy this week who was on the PL’s legal team till he moved firms recently - obviously tight lipped but was clear he had seen some unbelievable contemporaneous e mails from 115. I’ve yet to meet anyone who genuinely knows anything about this who thinks they’ll walk away from this. Where it ultimately leads, there’s no way of knowing so we have to wait like everyone else…A mate played golf with a guy who knows Richard Scudamore a couple of weeks ago. He said Scudamore has a letter in which City admit guilt to at least one of the charges against them. Tenuous, I know, but some of these charges will stick. What that means for punishment? F**k knows.