Martin Ødegaard: El Capitanø Campeone

  • Thread starter Trilly
  • Start Date
  • Replies 13,437
  • Views 1,431,757
  • Watchers 247

Should Ødegaard stay or go?

  • Keep him

  • Sell him


Results are only viewable after voting.

PrinzPoldi

Well-Known Member

Country: USA

Player:Havertz
The game plan you talking about is the same game plan every small team adapts cs City. Defend for dear life and hope to ride your luck. With Ode our chances are much better as we are much better team. Without him you will see City play with 5 attacking players as we are zero threat from midfield. We rode our luck last season I doubt same will happen
out of all bad luck, I think it is kind of a bid lucky that Ode was underperforming in our first three games.
it will be a tragedy to have an in-form Ode out.
 

KarlAFC

Active Member

Country: England
out of all bad luck, I think it is kind of a bid lucky that Ode was underperforming in our first three games.
it will be a tragedy to have an in-form Ode out.
It's likely that Ødegaard and Merino return around the same time. Once settled in, Merino occupies the 8 while Rice slots in at 6. Martin can then play in his favoured 10 role.
 

2Smokeyy

Standin' On Bihness! 💯

Country: England
Neither am I , interested to see how we are a bit more direct. Besides the last two times we have visited City might as well have played with 10 men he was so ineffective

Pep would have set up with an aggressive press to nullify Ødegaard by stopping him from turning and facing their defence.

Hoping we keep compact and break on them with pace. That’s where one of our best opportunities came last season when Trossard failed to square it to Martinelli in the space. Chelsea in the PL and Utd during their FA Cup final done well vs City by employing those tactics. Jackson in particular was causing them all sorts of problems.
 

GunnerRocket

Member

Country: USA

Player:Saka
We dont really mate, because we wont look to be as aggressive as we usually are. We can focus on our shape and how to create the turnovers and space we need.

Of course if I had a choice he'd be there, helping us with that game plan.

I remember when we started Kieran Tierney vs City. Now we have the towers and White/Timber with Caliafori/Zinny in reserve. Offense wasn't our problem then. Also City gives up goals. They aren't a stout defensive side.

The difference for both sides last year was a Martinelli goal at Emirates.
 

celestis

Arsenal-Mania Veteran
Moderator

Country: Australia
Pep would have set up with an aggressive press to nullify Ødegaard by stopping him from turning and facing their defence.

Hoping we keep compact and break on them with pace. That’s where one of our best opportunities came last season when Trossard failed to square it to Martinelli in the space. Chelsea in the PL and Utd during their FA Cup final done well vs City by employing those tactics. Jackson in particular was causing them all sorts of problems.

We definitely will stay compact. Too bad Sterling isn’t fit yet. Here is pretty effective against City
 

Tir Na Nog

Won’t accept b*tch position

Country: Ireland
He's not really that big a miss against City because we'll likely see something similar as the NLD and I can't recall Ødegaard ever doing too much against them either tbh.
 

blaze_of_glory

Pro Censorship
Moderator

Country: Canada
We're going to be as boring and stingy as anyone has ever seen us this weekend now, even more than we would have been before. And the usual suspects will say we aren't being ambitious enough. Of course, if we were ambitious and went for it and got smacked they'd be saying we're naive.
 

Rasmi

Negative Nancy Deluxe

Country: England
Yes. And based on your reply, you seem think it's poor management to both have kept Vieira and loaned him?
I think it’s poor management to have built a squad so reliant on Ødegaard that we give up the idea of actually playing through midfield if he is not here
 

blaze_of_glory

Pro Censorship
Moderator

Country: Canada
I think it’s poor management to have built a squad so reliant on Ødegaard that we give up the idea of actually playing through midfield if he is not here
As I said before, and which you seemed to agree with, if we had kept Vieira you would also have called that poor squad management. Because you base you posts entirely on opposing whatever the current state is.

E.g. last year you wanted us to sign Rice when it looked like City might get him. Then once we got him you started hating on him lol.
 

PrinzPoldi

Well-Known Member

Country: USA

Player:Havertz
I think it’s poor management to have built a squad so reliant on Ødegaard that we give up the idea of actually playing through midfield if he is not here
our attack is pretty even in everywhere, from the middle, right or left.
maybe a bit more on the right, but majority definitely is not from the middle.
 

Your Predictions for Premier League: Matchweek 6

 10 Oct 2026 12:30
CHE CHE - BOU BOU
Upcoming
 10 Oct 2026 15:00
AVL AVL - BRE BRE
Upcoming
 10 Oct 2026 15:00
SUN SUN - BHA BHA
Upcoming
 10 Oct 2026 15:00
IPS IPS - FUL FUL
Upcoming
 10 Oct 2026 15:00
MUN MUN - TOT TOT
Upcoming
 10 Oct 2026 15:00
HUL HUL - EVE EVE
Upcoming
 11 Oct 2026 14:00
CRY CRY - NFO NFO
Upcoming
 11 Oct 2026 14:00
LIV LIV - MCI MCI
Upcoming
 11 Oct 2026 16:30
COV COV - NEW NEW
Upcoming
 12 Oct 2026 20:00

Latest News

Latest posts

Arsenal Quotes

Of the nine red cards this season we probably deserved half of them

Arsène Wenger

Premier League - Live Table

Team P W D L Goals GD Pts
1
Manchester City
Manchester City
W W W W W
5 5 0 0 13:5 +8 15
2
Arsenal
Arsenal
L W W W W
5 4 0 1 8:4 +4 12
3
Brighton
Brighton
W W D L W
5 3 1 1 16:5 +11 10
4
Brentford
Brentford
W D D D W
5 2 3 0 10:4 +6 9
5
Leeds
Leeds
D W D D W
5 2 3 0 7:3 +4 9
6
Liverpool
Liverpool
W D W D D
5 2 3 0 7:4 +3 9
7
Everton
Everton
W D D D W
5 2 3 0 6:3 +3 9
8
Hull
Hull
L D D W W
5 2 2 1 6:4 +2 8
9
Newcastle
Newcastle
W L D W D
5 2 2 1 9:9 0 8
10
Chelsea
Chelsea
L D L W W
5 2 1 2 10:12 -2 7
11
Ipswich
Ipswich
L W L L W
5 2 0 3 7:11 -4 6
12
Manchester United
Manchester United
D L D W L
5 1 2 2 8:8 0 5
13
Nottingham Forest
Nottingham Forest
L W D D L
5 1 2 2 4:5 -1 5
14
Sunderland
Sunderland
L L D W L
5 1 1 3 6:10 -4 4
15
Crystal Palace
Crystal Palace
D L W L L
5 1 1 3 6:11 -5 4
16
Aston Villa
Aston Villa
W L D L L
5 1 1 3 4:9 -5 4
17
Bournemouth
Bournemouth
L D D D L
5 0 3 2 6:8 -2 3
18
Coventry
Coventry
W L L L L
5 1 0 4 1:10 -9 3
19
Fulham
Fulham
D D L L L
5 0 2 3 5:8 -3 2
20
Tottenham
Tottenham
L D D L L
5 0 2 3 2:8 -6 2
Top Bottom