No. Since Stan took full control he's spent more than Henry in spite of not having enormous player sales like Coutinho to buoy spending. If you look at his spending with the Nuggets and Rams as well as the money he put into developing the Rams stadium, there's really no comparison. They're getting sick of Henry in Boston because he keeps letting free agents go instead of paying them. Very different ownership styles and I would be shocked if we become as austere as Liverpool appear to be relative to what they should be able to spend anytime soon.Aren’t their investment levels reasonably similar?