berric
Established Member
Player:Trossard
You can start a midfield of 2010 Xavi - Iniesta - Busquets here and I'm sure Tets would find a way to make it not work.
Agree with this. Except point no 2 can`t really be an excuse for Arteta. Any improvement in opposition has to be improvement for all the teams in the league and its Arteta`s job to identify a solution for that. So I would say point no 2 is just a specific aspect within point no 1.The problem is three fold:
1) Arteta: he simply hasn't been able to coax a good midfield passing game out of us in his whole time here. If there's one characteristic of his coaching so far it's that, we just don't have a coherent way of working it through the middle; players aren't calm enough on the ball to pick options through the middle, Arteta clearly teaches them a risk-averse way of "resisting" the pess.
2) More sophisticated opposition pressing: Not going to get into an argument with the 'league hasn't improved / pressing hasn't improved on a global level in the league' negationists here, but there is no question that the problems Wenger was facing from oppositions in terms of pressing and complicating the construction of attacks from the middle are radically different on average than the ones Arteta is facing. Sophistication of pressing and level of pressing / instruction to press higher has gone up and changed drastically throughout football over the last 10 years, and even Wenger was starting to suffer from this more and more later in his career, hence why he fooled around with 3 at the back formations, hence why there were times where our midfield was wholly dysfunctional under him at times (recalls 15-16 when Cazorla was hurt and Ramsey and Flamini / Coquelin was the midfield partnership and we could not work it through the middle whatsoever)...his last season we ranked 5th in possession, pretty unheard of for a Wenger side in England.
3) Personnel: I've seen Lokonga get hyped up a bit in his thread but he's simply not ready to be an option resisting the press at this point in his development, and Thomas is a DM who is not a natural option to build attacks either, making Lokonga and Thomas a pretty low-end pivot for construction of attacks and building up from the back. We miss Xhaka here whether people like to admit it or not. Though obviously personnel and coaching are interrelated phenomenon and it is undeniable that we are not getting the best out of the personnel in this aspect.
Yeah, I mention it because the initial post used Wenger midfields as a comparison point. But I agree. It's not an excuse. It's just a bit of context re: the comparison point made.Agree with this. Except point no 2 can`t really be an excuse for Arteta. Any improvement in opposition has to be improvement for all the teams in the league and its Arteta`s job to identify a solution for that. So I would say point no 2 is just a specific aspect within point no 1.
For all of this finger-pointing towards Arteta, we had 4 bloody seasons to replace Xhaka after Wenger left.
We are just trying to bypass our own CM by putting less and less people there. But why can't we just buy a good midfield for a change?
I think one good CM would be enough, as Partey/Xhaka can cover the other position.
That's modern football for you, the modern day CM is vastly different from the days of Vieira and Gliberto. Teams want to build up from the flanks and will bypass the CM no matter how good their CMs are. We can have prime Vieira and Cesc playing for us now and Arteta will still want us to bypass our own CM.
1. | Liverpool | 53 | |
2. | Manchester City | 47 | |
3. | Manchester United | 37 | |
4. | Chelsea | 34 | |
5. | Arsenal | 30 | |
6. | Leicester City | 26 | |
7. | Tottenham Hotspur | 25 | |
8. | Wolverhampton Wanderers | 23 | |
9. | Leeds United | 22 | |
10. | Norwich City | 20 | |
11. | Aston Villa | 18 | |
12. | Brentford | 18 | |
13. | Brighton and Hove Albion | 18 | |
14. | Southampton | 17 | |
15. | Crystal Palace | 14 | |
16. | West Ham United | 13 | |
17. | Newcastle United | 11 | |
18. | Burnley | 10 | |
19. | Everton | 10 | |
20. | Watford | 8 |
1. | Manchester City | 287 | |
2. | Liverpool | 284 | |
3. | West Ham United | 276 | |
4. | Burnley | 273 | |
5. | Aston Villa | 256 | |
6. | Southampton | 240 | |
7. | Leeds United | 236 | |
8. | Everton | 224 | |
9. | Manchester United | 220 | |
10. | Newcastle United | 210 | |
11. | Brentford | 208 | |
12. | Brighton and Hove Albion | 208 | |
13. | Chelsea | 207 | |
14. | Watford | 203 | |
15. | Tottenham Hotspur | 192 | |
16. | Norwich City | 190 | |
17. | Wolverhampton Wanderers | 188 | |
18. | Crystal Palace | 185 | |
19. | Arsenal | 176 | |
20. | Leicester City | 154 |
I'm still waiting for him to play a midfield 3 - not even for 90 minutes, just for a spell in a game when we're losing control of the middle area.You can start a midfield of 2010 Xavi - Iniesta - Busquets here and I'm sure Tets would find a way to make it not work.
Arteta gave up on Guendouzi and Torreira for non footballing reasons I think but when he had a chance to give minutes to AMN & Willock he went for Ceballos and Elneny who were never going to be long term solutions, and inexplicably decided to build around Granit Xhaka.Ignoring the system we play and just looking at players, I have a feeling that our midfield was much better with Douzi, Torreira, and Ramsey around. We've invested 100m since then just to downgrade. All the new players look like half-solutions, even glorified Partey didn't impress that much