CaviarSausage
Member
I've been lurking this forum on and off for the last ten years. In that time I've seen some terrible takes but today is the day I had to register to comment because this thread is by far the worst thing I've ever seen in this forum.Like I proved, they really didn’t outspend us by much. And our team was still much better than theirs. We should have won more than we did. Wenger underachieved, even when he had money. And with the team we had we certainly should have won the Champions league, let alone the uefa cup.
People claiming that Ferguson didn't spend much? What kind of garbage hot take is this. You're saying 70 million isn't much of a difference?
Let's put that in perspective. In 2000 the world record transfer fee was 37 million. So Ferguson outspent Wenger by twice the world record transfer fee. In today's terms that would be the equivalent of 400 million pounds. Would you consider 400 million not much of a difference?
Also you need to take net spend into consideration (transfers in minus transfers out), since Wenger would have needed to make big sales to generate the cash flow needed to make purchases, something Ferguson didn't need to worry about.
Between 1998 and 2003 Wenger had a net spent 21 million. In that same 5 year period Ferguson had a net spend of 140 million. Meaning Ferguson was able to outspend Wenger by 7 times!
Between 2009 and 2014 Man City had a net spend of 441.5 million Euros. In that same period Man United had a net spend of 125.2 million euros. So Man City outspent Man United by 3.5 times.
Ferguson was buying the league before Man City was even a thing. In fact the advantage he had over Wenger was double that of Man City and their unlimited oil budget!
Would anyone here claim Pellegrini was a frugal tactical genius for winning the league? Because if Ferguson is a genius for besting Wenger by outspending him 7 to 1 than Pellegrini is the undisputed GOAT manager of the premier league.
Ferguson spent the equivalent of 2/3 of the world's transfer record on a defender in 2002. So in today's terms he spent 130 million in a defender. He absolutely had a massive financial advantage over Wenger. Yet the clowns on here are claiming that Ferguson and Wenger were in equal financial footing.
You'd think with Maxingtrax providing weekly lectures on football economics the anti-Wenger clowns on here would finally have an understanding on it but alas here we are.