Paperino
It’s Timo Time
Country: Sweden
From this we can conclude that "Science = excuses".
Your mommy gave you a hug after seeing that post, Trilly? That backpass from White was inexcusable no matter what you say.
From this we can conclude that "Science = excuses".
I'm not excusing anything here, are you sure your brain is hydrated? It might be a raisin.Your mommy gave you a hug after seeing that post, Trilly? That backpass from White was inexcusable no matter what you say.
Sorry mate, I must have missed the part where I said they'd decline straight away.Just cos players turn 30 doesn’t mean they’ll decline straight away lmao a lot of
the best players in the world are 30+.
Arsenal fans too obsessed with youth they think anyone over 23 is a ticking time bomb. Liverpool still have some of the best players in the league and will compete at the top as long as they stay fit.
I imagine he’ll be sacked if we’re 8th and practically out of the race for 4th by Xmas. Absolutely no chance he’s allowed to continue if we finish 8th or lower again. 6th will most probably see him sacked, and so it should. Add to that the brand of football and he’s history.
Your mommy gave you a hug after seeing that post, Trilly? That backpass from White was inexcusable no matter what you say.
I think 6th would be seen as improvement within the club, meaning Micky stays, and I wouldn’t have too much of an argument with that stance.I imagine he’ll be sacked if we’re 8th and practically out of the race for 4th by Xmas. Absolutely no chance he’s allowed to continue if we finish 8th or lower again. 6th will most probably see him sacked, and so it should. Add to that the brand of football and he’s history.
It has to be 6th and a very good story to go with it, with good reason to believe we’re going to improve at the very least, otherwise I can’t see how they’ll think they’re getting value for money.I think 6th would be seen as improvement within the club, meaning Micky stays, and I wouldn’t have too much of an argument with that stance.
What do you mean by targetting Liverpools position? Do we only try to beat Liverpool and not the other top teams? I don’t get it. I just thought we needed to win more than the other teams in the league, how do we target liverpool specifically?Sorry mate, I must have missed the part where I said they'd decline straight away.
That said, give me the list of outfield players who are better in their 30s than late 20s.
The question is how quickly they will decline. Their ability to stay fit is all part of that 'decline'. For some it comes early (Rooney, Fabregas). For others they maintain a high level for much longer. But they still decline.
That's why Liverpool's position is clearly the one to target. If you want to make an argument for it being Chelsea, Man City or UTD by all means articulate it.
The point about players over 23 being a ticking time bomb? Literally never heard anybody say this. You've just made it up. I mean the very reason for signing players sub 23 is because 3 years into their 5 year contract, if they want out, they should have a high resale value. That's not because they're a ticking timebomb.
6th and all these guys like Tomiyasu, White, Ode, Ramsdale, Lokonga, ESR etc showing promise, IS the story.It has to be 6th and a very good story to go with it, with good reason to believe we’re going to improve at the very least, otherwise I can’t see how they’ll think they’re getting value for money.
There’s context to every league position and if ours speaks worse than our finishing position (Losing your first three games is not the context you want) then it can’t be ignored. For example, scraping 6th at the end because we strung 3 streaky wins together playing like sh!t while the teams in front of us dropped points, is meaningless with regards to thinking that was improvement or expecting more next season. Id like to think the club would be grateful, but would also decide we need a different manager for our EL campaign.If Micky gets above 8, surely you all see that as an improvement, no? Like Wrighty said.
If Micky gets above 8, surely you all see that as an improvement, no? Like Wrighty said.
If basing it on last season but I don't believe we appointed Arteta with the belief it would take him 2 and a half seasons just to make top 6. I still believe CL, with the signings and extensions we made, as the clubs intention last season and he badly failed at that.
Be patient, only three years left:Yes, CL was the goal last season. When they realised that Arteta cant take us there they came up with this long-term youth project.
If they repeat it long enoughn I might start to believe it.Be patient, only three years left:
Sp**s played poor in most of their games this season they just happened to pick up points.Anyway: There will be no bad grass against Sp**s so what will be the excuse if we play like **** in that game? The lack of sunshine? Our third choice goalkeeper being absent?
You’re gonna get more out of Mo Salah the next 5 years than you are Saka or ESR so their ages doesn’t matter. This isn’t the 90s players play well into their 30s with modern technology.Sorry mate, I must have missed the part where I said they'd decline straight away.
That said, give me the list of outfield players who are better in their 30s than late 20s.
The question is how quickly they will decline. Their ability to stay fit is all part of that 'decline'. For some it comes early (Rooney, Fabregas). For others they maintain a high level for much longer. But they still decline.
That's why Liverpool's position is clearly the one to target. If you want to make an argument for it being Chelsea, Man City or UTD by all means articulate it.
The point about players over 23 being a ticking time bomb? Literally never heard anybody say this. You've just made it up. I mean the very reason for signing players sub 23 is because 3 years into their 5 year contract, if they want out, they should have a high resale value. That's not because they're a ticking timebomb.