Sanchez11
Fs FC
Country: England
We have the money cpuld be our lw signing even though hes cam.
Depends who we let go and how we adopt in the future.We also have no space for him.
Ødegaard and Kai (as much as people don’t like it) are options there, with Ethan also likely to play there more next season.
70-80m euros max for me. With the same price, i want to take Xavi Simons too. But its hard for RB to sell Xavi and Sesko.How much money we talking here? Villa seem open to let him go they in mess situation after missing out CL
We need different profiles ahead of him but I wouldn’t say no.
Yeh agree I would love if we moved the ball faster in the middle (Zubi would facilitate this but I mean mentality wise from the coach) and to play someone like Rogers in midfield.I actually think profile wise, we could really do with a guy like him (PnP dribbling from the middle, G/A ect).
Its just CF and LW are slightly ahead in terms of priorities.
This is where last summer was a disaster. Lets say if we could have got the Šeško thing over the line, all efforts could be on the LW and a guy like Rodgers.
Yeh agree I would love if we moved the ball faster in the middle (Zubi would facilitate this but I mean mentality wise from the coach) and to play someone like Rogers in midfield.
But Arteta’s mentality is probably lending to Rogers being LW and continuing Rice x Ødegaard as CMs.
I think this summer is really showing how rigid and lacking of imagination we are - and I must admit it comes down to Arteta just as much as the board. Liverpool and City are buying different types of players that you wouldn’t normally expect them to even need/target - especially city.
And meanwhile we are still gonna be playing CBs at fullback, still have a lack of spark creativity wise, and are still targeting the same players we wanted for the last 1-2 years.
I highly doubt we are looking for Rogers on top of a marquee LW signing. If we were, it would show we have elite ambition - January showed this is highly unlikely.
Someone who isn’t rigid would think that maybe Rogers can sometimes play with Ødegaard as well. If we went City mode where they hoarded creative players and rotated.Rogers for me would compete with Ødegaard, but we're obviously not bringing in a player at that price level for that specific role.
I think there are pro's and cons to it. We are definitely rigid in the market in the Arteta era, we go for a really specific type of player, which means we have fewer duds, but also fewer potential superstars.
Someone who isn’t rigid would think that maybe Rogers can sometimes play with Ødegaard as well. If we went City mode where they hoarded creative players and rotated.
For me I think Rodrygo will get kicked out.Yeah, I’d be all for that.
I actually think Rogers is the profile we’re missing in midfield. He basically ticks every box for me.
Šeško, Rodrygo and Rogers is my wishlist scenario.
Could be the Rodrygo backup signing...? Wishful thinking perhaps
Problem is it costs around 270-300m including Zubimendi. We have enough money for it but won’t spend it.Yeah, I’d be all for that.
I actually think Rogers is the profile we’re missing in midfield. He basically ticks every box for me.
Šeško, Rodrygo and Rogers is my wishlist scenario.
I don't mean to make this into an Arteta thing but this is something that @A_G and I especially have worried about for a while, it started for me when I realised that what Arteta wants in a striker pretty much rules out most realistic targets. He requires a set of attributes in a striker that means he either wants somebody perfect Isak or will 'settle' for someone like Havertz with no room inbetween for strikers who would get us more goals than Kai. It's a big part of why we've ended up with two strikers on the books, neither of which can really finish.I think this summer is really showing how rigid and lacking of imagination we are - and I must admit it comes down to Arteta just as much as the board. Liverpool and City are buying different types of players that you wouldn’t normally expect them to even need/target - especially city.
And meanwhile we are still gonna be playing CBs at fullback, still have a lack of spark creativity wise, and are still targeting the same players we wanted for the last 1-2 years.
I highly doubt we are looking for Rogers on top of a marquee LW signing. If we were, it would show we have elite ambition - January showed this is highly unlikely.
Semenyo is not a bad shout.Problem is it costs around 270-300m including Zubimendi. We have enough money for it but won’t spend it.
If we can’t sign a Rodrygo level guy then I would take a Semenyo instead on top of the people we have mentioned.