NieThePiet
Loves Overhyping Our Rivals
All Hale End Academy players who have to help out als LB will turn great, I believe.
Me neither, I didn't mind it initially when Wenger did it - my problem is I still have scars from AMN man - I hated full-back for him (still do). And it didn't help his cause that he just didn't apply himself enough while there either. I'll die on the hill that he'd have been a much better player if he continued the trajectory he was already on before they decided he had to be a full-back.I don't mind him settling in a LB for a while. Bit less pressure on him there.
It's the sort of thing Wenger would have done.
Skelly and Nwaneri also combine really well with each other. They have good chemistry on the pitch. As they've played together for years.Reminds me of Romeo Lavia, press resistant but he has really good vision.
I’ve been waiting all season for Calafiori to play just like MLS played, inverting but making it COUNT, not just adding to numbers forward.
If we can integrate MLS into this team, and somehow get Nwaneri in there the potential is outrageous. Nwaneri probably more next season he’s just too young, but MLS is too talented and physically ready.
It will save Arteta plenty of headaches having MLS to play LB/LCM. All he needs to find is 1-2 special forward players to push us to the next level.
I never saw AMN ever making it as a midfielder at the highest level. Same way I felt about Oxlade Chamberlain when Wenger started saying he had potential as a CM, they both just lack that je ne sais quoi, that special something. Skelly has it in spades. Some people try to compare him to Joe Wiillock, not a bad comparison as I actually always rated Joe's talent in midfield, but Skelly has a bit more guile and agility than Joe.Me neither, I didn't mind it initially when Wenger did it - my problem is I still have scars from AMN man - I hated full-back for him (still do). And it didn't help his cause that he just didn't apply himself enough while there either. I'll die on the hill that he'd have been a much better player if he continued the trajectory he was already on before they decided he had to be a full-back.
I just don't want it to become permanent for Lewis-Skelly - he'll still be a great player even if he stays there as he has a different temperament and is IMO a superior talent, but I'd much rather he be given the keys to the middle of the park at some point. A player who can pass like that, dribble like he does and has the strength, tenacity and agility to win the ball the way he often does should be the general dominating the midfield. Inverted full-back roles should be for guys like Zinchenko. Midfielders who are tidy but don't (or can't) dominate. We've even got a few guys like that in the academy. Theo Julienne is a nice little player. He's not as dominant as some of the other talents in the midfield but he looks fantastic in a support role from RB. Very good technique, almost Trent like. Michal Rosiak is another who can do that role, and he has the whole set-piece deal aswell (corners, free-kicks etc).
Have to add (general comment), the Zinchenko comparison is ridiculous IMO. Zinchenko's a good technical talent, and a very smart player when he's on point. That said, Lewis-Skelly can do what Zinchenko does - Zinchenko can't do what Lewis-Skelly does. Nuff said. That's why guys like Zinchenko and AMN (nowadays) play full-back - because they have to. Trent to me is the only exception to this, and now Lewis-Skelly.
You'd hope minus the zinchencko brain farts.I have seen someone in reddit say that MLS is basically Zinchenko with less technical ability and more athletic ability....... except the gap technically is arguably smaller than the athletic advantage. I tend to agree with him.
Very true but with Partey likely to leave in the summer, I would like to see MLS learn his style of play. That would make him a very complete CM around whom, dare I say, a team or at least a consistently functioning midfield could be built.I don't mind him settling in a LB for a while. Bit less pressure on him there.
It's the sort of thing Wenger would have done.
Calafiori doesn't really invert the same way though, he goes forward from the wing like Ben White. He's not a midfielder so he won’t play like that, which is actually a good thing because we need someone to provide width there so that Martinelli/Trossard can play more centrally.Reminds me of Romeo Lavia, press resistant but he has really good vision.
I’ve been waiting all season for Calafiori to play just like MLS played, inverting but making it COUNT, not just adding to numbers forward.
If we can integrate MLS into this team, and somehow get Nwaneri in there the potential is outrageous. Nwaneri probably more next season he’s just too young, but MLS is too talented and physically ready.
It will save Arteta plenty of headaches having MLS to play LB/LCM. All he needs to find is 1-2 special forward players to push us to the next level.
Yeah, I'm starting to feel the same way also. Nwaneri convinced me that we don't need another AM type signing, and MLS is starting to convince me that we don't need a deep lying playmaker type either. Just blood these two in and spend the big bucks on a LW and a Jesus replacement.Yeh I’m starting to think we may not need to sign a highly technical CM which I was wishlisting. Wouldn’t wanna block him.
Maybe sign an attacking mid type player instead if we wanna give MLS a chance at CM (hopefully).
Yeah, I'm starting to feel the same way also. Nwaneri convinced me that we don't need another AM type signing, and MLS is starting to convince me that we don't need a deep lying playmaker type either. Just blood these two in and spend the big bucks on a LW and a Jesus replacement.
Me neither, I didn't mind it initially when Wenger did it - my problem is I still have scars from AMN man - I hated full-back for him (still do). And it didn't help his cause that he just didn't apply himself enough while there either. I'll die on the hill that he'd have been a much better player if he continued the trajectory he was already on before they decided he had to be a full-back.
I just don't want it to become permanent for Lewis-Skelly - he'll still be a great player even if he stays there as he has a different temperament and is IMO a superior talent, but I'd much rather he be given the keys to the middle of the park at some point. A player who can pass like that, dribble like he does and has the strength, tenacity and agility to win the ball the way he often does should be the general dominating the midfield. Inverted full-back roles should be for guys like Zinchenko. Midfielders who are tidy but don't (or can't) dominate. We've even got a few guys like that in the academy. Theo Julienne is a nice little player. He's not as dominant as some of the other talents in the midfield but he looks fantastic in a support role from RB. Very good technique, almost Trent like. Michal Rosiak is another who can do that role, and he has the whole set-piece deal aswell (corners, free-kicks etc).
Have to add (general comment), the Zinchenko comparison is ridiculous IMO. Zinchenko's a good technical talent, and a very smart player when he's on point. That said, Lewis-Skelly can do what Zinchenko does - Zinchenko can't do what Lewis-Skelly does. Nuff said. That's why guys like Zinchenko and AMN (nowadays) play full-back - because they have to. Trent to me is the only exception to this, and now Lewis-Skelly.
Same here. Always felt he lacked the passing ability, tenacity and focus needed to excel there. Who knows if things had turned out differently had he been played there more.I never saw AMN ever making it as a midfielder at the highest level. Same way I felt about Oxlade Chamberlain when Wenger started saying he had potential as a CM, they both just lack that je ne sais quoi, that special something. Skelly has it in spades. Some people try to compare him to Joe Wiillock, not a bad comparison as I actually always rated Joe's talent in midfield, but Skelly has a bit more guile and agility than Joe.
I did. I saw him doing what Rice is doing now. That much pace and technical ability and it went to waste because he was too casual and didn't stay switched on for the full 90 in most games. Telegraphing simple balls and lazy decision making killed him as much as playing at full-back did. A few of the players we produced around that time had that problem but he typified it.I never saw AMN ever making it as a midfielder at the highest level. Same way I felt about Oxlade Chamberlain when Wenger started saying he had potential as a CM, they both just lack that je ne sais quoi, that special something. Skelly has it in spades. Some people try to compare him to Joe Wiillock, not a bad comparison as I actually always rated Joe's talent in midfield, but Skelly has a bit more guile and agility than Joe.
Don't think we'll ever know. He certainly didn't help himself at times. He was excellent whenever he locked in, but sometimes he just didn't - inexplicably at times. Even at U21 level he was like that and I thought it was just because he'd outgrown that level but I think that was just him!Do you think if AMN had received a proper go at CM and applied himself a bit more he could have had a decent career here?
I think the initial run at FB was a good introduction to first team football for him, but there's an argument that it may have hindered him longer term. The weaknesses he had in terms of positional play and concentration you can get away with a bit more at FB, particularly with his exceptional pace. If he'd got a proper run at CM it may have forced him to improve on the areas, or at least sink or swim.
To me there's something about Myles that is almost Saka like, not ability wise, he just has that natural composure which is rare for a player of his limited experience. He feels like a first team player already.
No pressure there thenNwaneri can grow into being our Musiala and Lewis-Skelly could become our Camavinga.