New rules regarding locked threads and bumps.

[A_G]

What a tragedy ffs, no links should mean thread closures.

There’s 100 pages worth of threads. Should we lock every one where there’s no link or just let them die naturally?

 

[Sanchez11]

There’s 100 pages worth of threads. Should we lock every one where there’s no link or just let them die naturally?

Delete them over 5 years old if no relevance.

 

[El Duderino]

What a tragedy ffs, no links should mean thread closures.

They are still getting closed if they become inactive.

It's more that sometimes there's a link every 3 days and this way people can keep the conversation going for a little longer.

If the links dry out, it's of course getting closed.

Idiotic bumps are still going to get punished.

This is just a step into getting people doing that thing called "thinking" before bumping something.

Think of it like the banned sources list, it's more of a guide than an exhaustive roll of fake itks.

 

[Sanchez11]

They are still getting closed of they become inactive.

It's more that sometimes there's a link every 3 days and this way people can keep the conversation going for a little longer.

Idiotic bumps are still going to get punished.

This is just a step into getting people doing that thing called "thinking" before bumping something.

Think of it like the banned sources list, it's more of a guide than an exhaustive roll of fake itks.

I never bump!

 

[A_G]

Delete them over 5 years old if no relevance.

I can’t

 

[El Duderino]

I never bump!

Not saying you do, just that this way there's an overall guideline.

 

[Dennis_Bergkamp_10]

They are still getting closed if they become inactive.

It's more that sometimes there's a link every 3 days and this way people can keep the conversation going for a little longer.

If the links dry out, it's of course getting closed.

Idiotic bumps are still going to get punished.

This is just a step into getting people doing that thing called "thinking" before bumping something.

Think of it like the banned sources list, it's more of a guide than an exhaustive roll of fake itks.

You guys need some sort of national garde here to enforce these rules? I'll volunteer.

 

[BigPoppaPump]

Thoughts and prayers with the “why isn’t this locked?” merchants

Look how far you lot are willing to go for Tierney.

 

[A_G]

Look how far you lot are willing to go for Tierney.

What?

 

[Let's play Aubamawang]

Thoughts and prayers with the “why isn’t this locked?” merchants

There's no links. Why isn't this thread locked?

 

[grange]

Can we run a poll on first to get banned? The Viktor?

 

[El Realista]

Finally we can re open the chances of Alan Smith coming back to play for Arsenal and Cambiasso running our midfield!! Jay Jay Okocha on the LW seems a great option as well!! Pure quality!

 

[smashed]

Your forum, your rules I guess

 

[smashed]

Finally we can re open the chances of Alan Smith coming back to play for Arsenal and Cambiasso running our midfield!! Jay Jay Okocha on the LW seems a great option as well!! Pure quality!
View attachment 35618

But which Alan Smith

 

[field442]

Can we have an automatic ban for any "close the thread" posts?

 

[A_G]

Can we have an automatic ban for any "close the thread" posts?

@Sanchez11

 

[Rex Caudillo]

Finally we can re open the chances of Alan Smith coming back to play for Arsenal and Cambiasso running our midfield!! Jay Jay Okocha on the LW seems a great option as well!! Pure quality!
View attachment 35618

Think that’s Leeds/Man Utd Alan Smith. Cambiasso would’ve absolutely cooked for us tbf.

Same summer we wanted to sign Messi I think.

 

[Halcyon Daze]

Finally we can re open the chances of Alan Smith coming back to play for Arsenal and Cambiasso running our midfield!! Jay Jay Okocha on the LW seems a great option as well!! Pure quality!
View attachment 35618

That’s a different Alan Smith FFS . Our Alan Smith would have been 42 in 2004.

 

[Sanchez11]

@Sanchez11

Ridiculous proposal!!

 

[El Realista]

That’s a different Alan Smith FFS . Our Alan Smith would have been 42 in 2004.

Still better than Havertz