Why they didn't cash in the summer? Now they about losing him for free. Big clubs can't stop acting stupid.
Genuinely I’d take him here. Think he’s mad underrated.
Not surprised, he’s a confidence player and needs minutes like when he was at West Ham.
9 goals and 4 assists in 6 months yet some still don’t rate him.
It's not about rating him. Don't try to twist what has been discussed. He was amazing at West Ham. Everyone knows that.9 goals and 4 assists in 6 months yet some still don’t rate him.
They also extended Mata for a year. I guess one thing affecting was Rashford's injury, but it's a different position.I don't know why United didn't try to sell Lingard when they could still get a decent fee for him last summer, as he clearly wasn't going to play much for them.
That's the kind kind of dumbness, you usually see from Arsenal
plus he would be a "Yanited reject" ...can understand why people don't want him.
It's not about rating him. Don't try to twist what has been discussed. He was amazing at West Ham. Everyone knows that.
It was also the first time in his career he was really good, so it can be a purple patch, and he seems like an old prick who hates Arsenal.
Why are people vouching for Lingard who only had 1 good half of a season with West Ham? Not the player we need to elevate our level.
Even it if is Lingard on short term, he had one good run is his carreer for six months. No proof that he won't push us for a CL spot, at all. 6 good months don't have weight over a carreer long of mediocrity.We need a boost in January to get a CL spot, if it’s Lingard then I’m all for it.
I think our fans on here are too obsessed with long term signings which rarely happen in January. If we sign Lingard for 5-10m and he give us a boost similar to West Ham (9 goals and 4 assists in the PL), I’d upgrade on him and make him a squad player if we secure CL football in the summer.
That’s the type of ruthlessness that gets you to the top. All the above is unlikely though as Utd wouldn’t improve us as we’re competing for a top 4 spot.
Even it if is Lingard on short term, he had one good run is his carreer for six months. No proof that he won't push us for a CL spot, at all. 6 good months don't have weight over a carreer long of mediocrity.
Honestly I was a bit baffled by why you were touting JLingz because long term he's clearly not the solution we need, but there is a kind of logic to bringing him in January for the goals. If it worked and we got a 3rd or 4th place finish it would give the club a massive platform to push on from. Personally I feel that Ødegaard needs to get a proper chance before he is replaced in the squad and he's the long term option for us if it works out so I wouldn't roll the dice on Lingard.We need a boost in January to get a CL spot, if it’s Lingard then I’m all for it.
I think our fans on here are too obsessed with long term signings which rarely happen in January. If we sign Lingard for 5-10m and he give us a boost similar to West Ham (9 goals and 4 assists in the PL), I’d upgrade on him and make him a squad player if we secure CL football in the summer.
That’s the type of ruthlessness that gets you to the top. All the above is unlikely though as Utd wouldn’t improve us as we’re competing for a top 4 spot.
Honestly I was a bit baffled by why you were touting JLingz because long term he's clearly not the solution we need, but there is a kind of logic to bringing him in January for the goals. If it worked and we got a 3rd or 4th place finish it would give the club a massive platform to push on from. Personally I feel that Ødegaard needs to get a proper chance before he is replaced in the squad and he's the long term option for us if it works out so I wouldn't roll the dice on Lingard.
When Lingard was about Ødegaard's age, or maybe a bit older, he had 4+1 in 1634 minutes in EPL. Next year 1+2 in 1366 minutes in EPL.I'm not sure yet, Ødegaard's always looked better in the team as a 10 rather than an 8, although when he gets his game together I think he'll be ok in either position. We need end product and goals in the side for sure though, ideally from our Number 10
How Barca can finance a deal like this?
Forgot this guy existed
I read it'll be a loan initially.How Barca can finance a deal like this?
City already signed him for more than 20m and is a better player now and is playing for a club with unlimited financial power.
So probably minimum the double?