Martinvonkeown
Well-Known Member
Country: USA
Don't think so. People were throwing their toys out of the pram when we signed him. He's done the job we signed him for.Am I the only Madueke fan left on AM?
Don't think so. People were throwing their toys out of the pram when we signed him. He's done the job we signed him for.Am I the only Madueke fan left on AM?
Disagree. Pepe had more talent, more composure in the box for sure, but he was also awful for long stretches, lacked security in possession and could shy away from asserting himslef if against a physical opponent. In a totally free late Wenger system, he would have been better, but in Arteta's system, he was a very bad fit.A player not doing well after Arsenal doesn’t mean anything though? Loss of momentum, confidence being damaged, constant adaptation periods, mental state all play a part so it’s a lazy point that doesn’t mean anything and assumes footballers are machines and not human beings.
Pepe was trending upwards career wise and struggled after Arsenal in weaker leagues than the one he exploded in. If your point is that struggling after Arsenal means he was never good enough then how did he earn the move to Arsenal in the first place?
If Noni or Martinelli go on to struggle after Arsenal are you gonna say they were never good enough for Arsenal? Oh and what about the players who have done better after Arsenal? What does that mean then? I could go on and on.
Anyway the point is that the Pepe Arteta couldn’t wait to get rid of is a better player than Noni or if you want to be generous they’re at similar levels. For Arteta to get rid of one just to sign an arguably worse player a few years later just doesn’t make sense.
Hutchinson had long decided to leave - he had turned down plenty of contract offers before Marquinhos turned up. He got a massive wage increase and got to play for the team he supported, so hard to argue with his decision.Glad you have mentioned marquinhos, his signature was likely the catalyst for Hutchison moving on and thus costing the club a lot more than the minimal transfer fee we paid for the Brazilian.
Marquinhos represents the issue with signing promising young players, they push back our own players, and no guarantee they make it either.
When both Diomande and Petuszewski moved in the summer, they were both incredibly raw. Both went to clubs with a strong reputation for developing players, we would have them in our youth team still, potentially barring Bailey Joseph from minutes there.
Despite the above, we should be considering signing more very young rough gems, but we are of a size that these players are more likely to move to us later in their career. Let Sporting/Leipzig enjoy their massive profit, we then get a polished version of the player we are happy to put in the first team.
I was unconvinced by the madueke signing when it happened, but given his relatively low wages, fee structure, that we know what to expect, and in theory his ability on the left wing (yet to see it of course) - his signing at that time made sense.
Sometimes 'lazy' is good - we have a competent player who has been a threat when saka out. We could have instead signed a Gittens, Garnacho, Sancho or Elanga - these being more akin to the profile we were likely considering. All have been inferior to Madueke this season.
Am I the only Madueke fan left on AM?
The "lazy signing" that completes our squad and wins us the league. I'll take that. The squad buys have taken us further in all comps than we've been for decades. If we do win a couple of trophies some on this forum will be eating big slices of humble pie.He’s perfect example of the flaw with mainly data analytics. He has great take on stats and get in great positions. If we can improve his final ball you have a player. It’s just lazy signing by a club and manager who has no real eye for pure talent
Said earlier in this thread that when you’re having to use every ounce of pace and power just to get past your man then your final ball/pass is going to be crap more often than not. Hoped for his sake that he’d learn to adjust his take-on approach or process quicker but it was always going to be a long shot at 23 years old.
It’s now very clear why he has amazing take on stats, and shots off the dribble stats but it’s also very clear why those didn’t translate to end product. This was a very lazy (or safe depending on your viewpoint) signing.
We basically paid 50M to sign a guaranteed ‘okay’ player instead of going into Europe and signing someone who could have been much better (Diomande and that polish kid have tripled their valuations in 2/3rd of a season btw) because we were worried they could be a flop. Then again with Mikel’s talent ID maybe going safe and lazy is the best choice or we’d end up with another Marquinhos or Mudryk.
And why's that? Because talented players famously never have their confidence broken by being benched indefinitely, never get rusty after playing 20 minutes a month etc?Had he been this amazing talent that Arteta mismanaged, he wouldn't have been terrible on loan and we might have got a fee.
He's also looked more dangerous than Saka this season.Nah I like him. He has done well as Saka backup.
Interesting that people (not you particulalrly) repeatedly bend over backwards to defend Pepe and say how he was destroyed by Arteta, while also laying into the players Arteta has bought who see the club in the strongest position its been in the last 20 years. Pepe has worse output this season as a nailed on starter in Spain than Madueke has as primarily a bench option....and its his best season in 4-5 yearsAnd why's that? Because talented players famously never have their confidence broken by being benched indefinitely, never get rusty after playing 20 minutes a month etc?
He wasted his prime years on our bench, on loan and in Turkey, doesn't look even half the player he was before we ruined him and he's still the main creator and a key player for a team sitting joint 3rd in La Liga. I don't know what more you can expect under his circumstances
He's also looked more dangerous than Saka this season.

Off the top of my head Neto Salah and Rogers are having comparable or better output than Saka this season.Interesting that people (not you particulalrly) repeatedly bend over backwards to defend Pepe and say how he was destroyed by Arteta, while also laying into the players Arteta has bought who see the club in the strongest position its been in the last 20 years. Pepe has worse output this season as a nailed on starter in Spain than Madueke has as primarily a bench option....and its his best season in 4-5 years
Nope. I've been thinking for some time that he's working out okay. Yeah he has his moments when he skies a shot into row z. He can be wasteful when it comes to end product. And the price tag for a backup seemed quite high at the time.Am I the only Madueke fan left on AM?
I’m a critic because of the use of funds for someone who doesn’t raise a ceiling we desperately needed raising in attack.Am I the only Madueke fan left on AM?
| Team | P | W | D | L | Goals | GD | Pts | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Arsenal
L
W
W
W
W
D
|
32 | 21 | 7 | 4 | 62:24 | +38 | 70 | |
| 2 |
Manchester City
W
D
D
W
W
W
|
31 | 19 | 7 | 5 | 63:28 | +35 | 64 | |
| 3 |
Manchester United
L
D
W
L
W
W
|
32 | 15 | 10 | 7 | 57:45 | +12 | 55 | |
| 4 |
Aston Villa
D
W
L
L
L
D
|
32 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 43:38 | +5 | 55 | |
| 5 |
Liverpool
W
L
D
L
W
W
|
32 | 15 | 7 | 10 | 52:42 | +10 | 52 | |
| 6 |
Chelsea
L
L
L
W
L
D
|
32 | 13 | 9 | 10 | 53:41 | +12 | 48 | |
| 7 |
Brentford
D
D
D
D
W
L
|
32 | 13 | 8 | 11 | 48:44 | +4 | 47 | |
| 8 |
Everton
D
W
L
W
W
L
|
32 | 13 | 8 | 11 | 39:37 | +2 | 47 | |
| 9 |
Brighton
W
W
W
L
W
W
|
32 | 12 | 10 | 10 | 43:37 | +6 | 46 | |
| 10 |
Sunderland
W
W
L
W
D
L
|
32 | 12 | 10 | 10 | 33:36 | -3 | 46 | |
| 11 |
Bournemouth
W
D
D
D
D
D
|
32 | 10 | 15 | 7 | 48:49 | -1 | 45 | |
| 12 |
Fulham
L
W
D
L
W
W
|
32 | 13 | 5 | 14 | 43:46 | -3 | 44 | |
| 13 |
Crystal Palace
W
D
W
L
W
L
|
31 | 11 | 9 | 11 | 35:36 | -1 | 42 | |
| 14 |
Newcastle
L
L
W
W
L
L
|
32 | 12 | 6 | 14 | 45:47 | -2 | 42 | |
| 15 |
Leeds
W
D
D
L
L
D
|
32 | 8 | 12 | 12 | 39:49 | -10 | 36 | |
| 16 |
Nottingham Forest
D
W
D
D
L
L
|
32 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 32:44 | -12 | 33 | |
| 17 |
West Ham
W
L
D
W
L
D
|
32 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 40:57 | -17 | 32 | |
| 18 |
Tottenham
L
L
D
L
L
L
|
32 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 40:51 | -11 | 30 | |
| 19 |
Burnley
L
L
D
L
L
D
|
32 | 4 | 8 | 20 | 33:63 | -30 | 20 | |
| 20 |
Wolves
L
D
W
W
L
D
|
32 | 3 | 8 | 21 | 24:58 | -34 | 17 |