stats nerdDiscounting our last two leauge wins away at the swamp, just 11.5% (seven out of 61) of north London derbies had been won by the away side – the lowest proportion of the 93 fixtures to be played at least 30 times in the Premier League era.
I don’t think we’ve ever done 3 away in all of history.
It's funny? I think you are the ones who don't understand it. You litteraly said what I am saying in a longer text. Read my comment again you replied to. I said and I will repeat so maybe you will understand it this time: THEY ARE CRAP BUT MORE ENTERTAINING.Being fun to watch is great, that’s what Sp**s do and good on them. The most entertaining side no doubt.
We on the other hand are now both good to watch and effective, that’s why you see us go to away grounds and win, and regularly put teams to the sword doing it.
Playing lovely football is not enough anymore, you need to do many things simultaneously, and that’s what we do now.
It’s funny you don’t understand this concept as an Arsenal supporter.
It's funny? I think you are the ones who don't understand it. You litteraly said what I am saying in a longer text. Read my comment again you replied to. I said and I will repeat so maybe you will understand it this time: THEY ARE CRAP BUT MORE ENTERTAINING.
Thank you
![]()
...low key one of our best ever North London Derby performers, his winner at Sh1te Hart Lane in 2014 is arguably the best ever goal we scored there.

It's funny? I think you are the ones who don't understand it. You litteraly said what I am saying in a longer text. Read my comment again you replied to. I said and I will repeat so maybe you will understand it this time: THEY ARE CRAP BUT MORE ENTERTAINING.
Thank you
This true?This is especially so when you realise they have their own injury problems - Bissouma, Solanke, Van de Ven and Richarlison are all out.
Hmmmm interesting…
Would honestly not put it past themI had a dream that in the Tottenham game, Saka is tackled brutally and given a straight red card for diving. The refs have traumatized me.

Sounds like BS to me and un-Arteta like, as exciting as it would be.Yup, this is very encouraging, I hope its true.
It allows us to keep our players in their respective zones and where they are likely most comfortable. We just need good pressers at CF and LCM and we will have a team very close to our best in game structure.
I think they are all in contention to play. Richarlison won't play anyway. Solanke und Van de Ven would be big misses.People are being overly negative about this one because of the injuries and suspension. Even without our two best midfielders out, we are still better than them in every area of the pitch. This is especially so when you realise they have their own injury problems - Bissouma, Solanke, Van de Ven and Richarlison are all out. Sp**s just aren't a good side.
Hmm, I'm not actually certain come to think of it - reading about it, they all seem doubts, but I guess unlikely that none of them will feature.I think they are all in contention to play. Richarlison won't play anyway. Solanke und Van de Ven would be big misses.
I don't think you have to be negative to realize that our chances of winning are diminished without Ødegaard and Rice in the middle.


It would be the ultimate STFU to the S**M fansDo people realise what this would mean if we go to Sp**s and win while missing 4/5 first team players and having all the rival fans excited about our injuries?
This would be a statement.