I just found it odd your comparing Sterling and Wilshere...they are very different players. Also Wilshere still has a lot to prove. Let's not forget that. His attitude has been questioned with the smoking etc...and bar some huge games he has also been overrated at times by many Arsenal fans. Like Sterling he has a lot to prove. He and Wenger both know this.The question was how is Wilshere better than Sterling and I explained why. So what if they play different positions? Let's not pretend they can't be compared. Iniesta is a better passer than Ronaldo yeah, is he a superior player no.
Under no circumstances am I underrating Sterling, I'm a huge fan he's got massive potential. But at this current moment, for me, Wilsh is a better player. Wouldn't put too much stock into that Golden Boy award either, Balotelli, Pato and bloody Anderson are among previous winners.
There isn't must between Sterling and Wilshere talent wise. Anybody saying one is much better than the other is either bias or deluded.