I don’t know why Arsenal fan think he’s so great at attacking. 1 goal 2 assists. Guys like Digne and Truffert has 5-6 assists in the league. Create far more and go all the way down the wing t create. Get a proper attacking fullbackJust rotate him with Hincapie and hopefully he'll be fine, no way we should sell.
His profile is so unique: a left-back who can dribble into the box and bang it in on his right foot. There is no player like that, we won't be able to replace him adequately.
This is a genuine point that keeps being ignored.I don’t know why Arsenal fan think he’s so great at attacking. 1 goal 2 assists. Guys like Digne and Truffert has 5-6 assists in the league.
He’s a very good ball playing CB doing a job on the left. Yeah people really mix the two. Give me a natural attacking lb and Hincapie and he’s not neededThis is a genuine point that keeps being ignored.
I think @RunTheTrap mentioned that him being good at build up play is somehow being conflated with him being this amazing attacking fullback.
Our stale attacking football + our left side options typically being worse on the ball is causing this imo.
Huijsen only went that cheap because of a release clauseI understand why Real Madrid want him. He can play almost every position in the back, but is also a threat going forward. He can dribble, find space and score a goal. There aren't many players out there like Calafiori, if there is one at all. We played some of the best football when he was fit and he was a chaos agent when we attack. This guy will do wonders if he can stay fit. But.
He is injury prone. But so are so many of our other players too. La Liga is less physical so he would probably fare well. This one is hard. If Real Madrid want him then I hope the club uses Dean Huijsen as benchmark. Real payed £50 million for Huijsen. Huijsen came from Bournemouth and didn't even make it in the world cup squad playing for Real Madrid. Calafiori is an Italy international, established and proven at 24 years of age.
If Huijsen could go for 50 then Calafiori ,who is more talented and has won more, costs £70 million
If we had a build-up monster in midfield, ala De Jong or Kroos, then Calafiori becomes redundant and a traditional, overlapping left back is a lot more attractive. As much football as he generates, he’s no Trent or a prime Cancelo.This is a genuine point that keeps being ignored.
I think @RunTheTrap mentioned that him being good at build-up play is somehow being conflated with him being this amazing attacking fullback.
Our stale attacking football + our left side options typically being worse on the ball is causing this imo.
That’s as much a tactical thing as it is a personel thing.
Our LB really shouldn’t be that crucial to our attacking play.
If we had a build-up monster in midfield, ala De Jong or Kroos, then Calafiori becomes redundant and a traditional, overlapping left back is a lot more attractive. As much football as he generates, he’s no Trent or a prime Cancelo.
We need to improve the technical levels of our midfield and attack then, which we should be able to if we get 80 million for him on top of our transfer budget.But it is because we lack that technical on the ball quality in midfield. That’s why Calafiori becomes so important.
Will people be happy with 50m + TAA?
I love Calafiori but I'd take something stupid over 80m given his injuries. Anyway Lunin lol for what?You're joking?
Under paying for one of the best LB (top 3 with Mendes and Hincapie)in the world and is also a great CB. Then on top of that, for a scouser who was the most dribbled past fall back in the league, on ridiculous wages and who would be our second choice RB? Makes no sense.
Considering the prices being quoted of PL players, that they just made a offer for 150m for a striker with 4 non penalty league goals; I being deadly serious when I say wouldn't except anything less than 120m. The only players I would even consider to reduce the rate is Courtois, Lunin, Paz, Bellingham and Enderick.I wouldn't want any other Madrid player near this club.
italy didnt even make it to the world cup thoughI understand why Real Madrid want him. He can play almost every position in the back, but is also a threat going forward. He can dribble, find space and score a goal. There aren't many players out there like Calafiori, if there is one at all. We played some of the best football when he was fit and he was a chaos agent when we attack. This guy will do wonders if he can stay fit. But.
He is injury prone. But so are so many of our other players too. La Liga is less physical so he would probably fare well. This one is hard. If Real Madrid want him then I hope the club uses Dean Huijsen as benchmark. Real payed £50 million for Huijsen. Huijsen came from Bournemouth and didn't even make it in the world cup squad playing for Real Madrid. Calafiori is an Italy international, established and proven at 24 years of age.
If Huijsen could go for 50 then Calafiori ,who is more talented and has won more, costs £70 million
| Team | P | W | D | L | Goals | GD | Pts | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Arsenal
W
W
W
W
W
L
|
38 | 26 | 7 | 5 | 71:27 | +44 | 85 | |
| 2 |
Manchester City
L
D
W
W
D
W
|
38 | 23 | 9 | 6 | 77:35 | +42 | 78 | |
| 3 |
Manchester United
W
W
D
W
W
W
|
38 | 20 | 11 | 7 | 69:50 | +19 | 71 | |
| 4 |
Aston Villa
W
W
D
L
L
W
|
38 | 19 | 8 | 11 | 56:49 | +7 | 65 | |
| 5 |
Liverpool
D
L
D
L
W
W
|
38 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 63:53 | +10 | 60 | |
| 6 |
Bournemouth
D
D
W
W
D
W
|
38 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 58:54 | +4 | 57 | |
| 7 |
Sunderland
W
W
D
D
L
L
|
38 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 42:48 | -6 | 54 | |
| 8 |
Brighton
L
L
W
L
W
D
|
38 | 14 | 11 | 13 | 52:46 | +6 | 53 | |
| 9 |
Brentford
D
D
L
W
L
D
|
38 | 14 | 11 | 13 | 55:52 | +3 | 53 | |
| 10 |
Chelsea
L
W
D
L
L
L
|
38 | 14 | 10 | 14 | 58:52 | +6 | 52 | |
| 11 |
Fulham
W
D
L
L
W
D
|
38 | 15 | 7 | 16 | 47:51 | -4 | 52 | |
| 12 |
Newcastle
L
W
D
W
L
L
|
38 | 14 | 7 | 17 | 53:55 | -2 | 49 | |
| 13 |
Everton
L
L
D
D
L
L
|
38 | 13 | 10 | 15 | 47:50 | -3 | 49 | |
| 14 |
Leeds
L
W
D
W
D
W
|
38 | 11 | 14 | 13 | 49:56 | -7 | 47 | |
| 15 |
Crystal Palace
L
D
L
D
L
L
|
38 | 11 | 12 | 15 | 41:51 | -10 | 45 | |
| 16 |
Nottingham Forest
D
L
D
W
W
W
|
38 | 11 | 11 | 16 | 48:51 | -3 | 44 | |
| 17 |
Tottenham
W
L
D
W
W
D
|
38 | 10 | 11 | 17 | 48:57 | -9 | 41 | |
| 18 |
West Ham
W
L
L
L
W
D
|
38 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 46:65 | -19 | 39 | |
| 19 |
Burnley
D
L
D
L
L
L
|
38 | 4 | 10 | 24 | 38:75 | -37 | 22 | |
| 20 |
Wolves
D
D
L
D
L
L
|
38 | 3 | 11 | 24 | 27:68 | -41 | 20 |