- Thread starter
- #321
Country: England
Good signing.
You are just trolling. There are plenty of alternatives to an OAP just like there are many alternatives to a LOW IQ Ex-Arsenal player pretending as a manager. These are indeed the bottom of the barrel types. You really think we cannot do better other than these creatures? If you believe that then you have the same level of IQ as Arteta... How can we do a rebuild and plan for long term when we are signing retirees?Keep seeing people post crap like this without giving any alternatives.
You are just trolling. There are plenty of alternatives to an OAP just like there are many alternatives to a LOW IQ Ex-Arsenal player pretending as a manager. These are indeed the bottom of the barrel types. You really think we cannot do better other than these creatures? If you believe that then you as much the same IQ as Arteta... How can we do a rebuild and plan for long term when we are signing retirees?
Do I have to enumerate the numerous retirees that we have signed?
So in your Arteta level vocabulary experience = retirees?Yeah but people like you are acting as if he's going to be our starting left back. And conveniently forgetting that Tierney is 23 years old. I'd rather signed an experienced defender than an 18 year old who you have no idea about.
Honestly it's completely nonsensical. Stop acting as if he's going to be our only signing and our starting left back. Blows my mind how stupid people are on here sometimes.
So in your Arteta level vocabulary experience = retirees?
My issue with regards to these signings is that we do not really have a good history regarding signing retirees, it is fine if we did but we don't. When will we ever learn that we suck and are unlucky when we sign these types?Bertrand played 2500 minutes in the premier league this season and 2700 minutes last season. Is that a retiree? No, no it's not. Hes an experienced premier league left back who will be on call if Tierney needs a break. Its not difficult to figure out, who cares when we spend money elsewhere on quality first team starters.
My issue with regards to these signings is that we do not really have a good history regarding signing retirees, it is fine if we did but we don't. When will we ever learn that we suck and are unlucky when we sign these types?
Who cares? Have you forgotten that one of our biggest issue right now is that we suck at unloading deadwood and we tend to lose good money dealing with this?
Fair enough. I like what you’ve said. Look no team has a 100% hit rate when it comes to transfers but obviously some clubs do it better than others. The reason why I say we should follow Leicester’s suit is because they are probably the closest team to us in terms of resources. Maybe you could add Liverpool too but they’ve obviously got a bit richer in recent years. We do not have the financial clout to keep doing short-term transfers like Betrand. Man City and Chelsea can but not us. As for Evans, he’s a CB, he does less running than Betrand so he can play well into his 30s. Some positions are different for others.Same Leicester that got Jonny Evans on a free transfer at 30 years of age and has played more minutes than any other outfield player at Leicester since he arrived? Same Leicester who signed 29 year old Christian Fuchs 6 years ago and gave him an extension 12 months ago?
Leicester have done some good to very good deals in the transfer market but its easy to look at the good ones and completely ignore the 14m they spent on a back GK who has been awful for them when he has played (Ward) or spent 35m of Ayoze who has scored 11 goals in 74 apperances or 27m on Iheanacho was scored more goals (10) in his last 10 games than he did in his previous 116 for the them.
If our standards are "what would Leicester do" then we are not going to improve to where we need to get to.
or bring back Nacho. Might still be enough juice in him to be solid for 15 games a season.
Fair enough. I like what you’ve said. Look no team has a 100% hit rate when it comes to transfers but obviously some clubs do it better than others. The reason why I say we should follow Leicester’s suit is because they are probably the closest team to us in terms of resources. Maybe you could add Liverpool too but they’ve obviously got a bit richer in recent years. We do not have the financial clout to keep doing short-term transfers like Betrand. Man City and Chelsea can but not us. As for Evans, he’s a CB, he does less running than Betrand so he can play well into his 30s. Some positions are different for others.
We've made two "retiree" signings under this regime. Willian who has failed and Cedric who has actually been good when called upon but for some reason is now completely out of favour.
There's nothing to say Bertrand will be a failure as backup to Tierney. Absolutely nothing.
Bertrand on a free plus wages / Doig for approx 5m plus wages, is probably around the same financial expenditure. One is a player on the up, the other a player on the down. I really don't think it's rocket science.
One player is a complete unknown, one is a premier league starter with 2500+ minutes under his belt almost every single season.
Bertrand is actually the smart option in this instance and Doig is the risky signing.
Who would you rather play, say KT gets injured in the opening games, Doig comes in game week 4 for the next 5 games, or Bertrand comes in?
I'm always going for the seasoned PL guy.
I literally posted his stats, he's not been good. You're basing your opinion on his general reputation, not on who he is now. He'll be 32 by next season, his best days are behind him.
And in answer to your question, I'd rather have Doig in that scenario. Personally I like a bit of excitement in my life, I'd wanna see what the kid could do.
I'm pro Bertrand, with the caveat that it's a 2 year deal.
Tierney is not far from a youngster himself, he's 23. He's a great LB but he's injury prone. You have to go into next season assuming he will miss significant game time for this reason.
Bertrand is ideal in this scenario. Good, reliable performer who won't need to adapt to the league and knows the role inside out.
Buy a kid and you're immediately putting pressure on an 18-19 year old with little experience to perform at a high level for maybe 1/3rd of a season due to KT's injuries.
People conveniently forget this thinking they're playing FIFA or football manager. Throwing a 18 year old into this Arsenal team behind Tierney is huge. The kid may thrive off it, but it can quite easily kill his confidence. With Bertrand you don't have any problems, he's steady, nothing special, but as a backup you don't need anything special until you're back in the CL. For now, for our current level, its shrewd business.